Results 51 to 60 of about 11,780 (189)

Adapted rating of the quality of reviews, based on AMSTAR-2 [43].

, 2023
Adapted rating of the quality of reviews, based on AMSTAR-2 [43].
Susanne Heumann (12519040), Sophie Alina Schneider (14664747), Silke Pawils (3819565), Daniel Mays (4263028), Franka Metzner (3819562)   +4 more
core   +1 more source

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. [PDF]

BMJ, 2017
The number of published systematic reviews of studies of healthcare interventions has increased rapidly and these are used extensively for clinical and policy decisions. Systematic reviews are subject to a range of biases and increasingly include non-randomised studies of interventions.
Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, Moher D, Tugwell P, Welch V, Kristjansson E, Henry DA.   +10 more
europepmc   +5 more sources

AMSTAR-2 quality appraisal questions and results for each included review.

, 2023
AMSTAR-2 quality appraisal questions and results for each included review.
Sarah Sowden (4241689), Amber Sacre (17628044), Josephine M. Wildman (17628047), Natalie Bennett (5057339), Clare Bambra (3572648), Adam Todd (3572645), Katie Thomson (3572651)   +6 more
core   +1 more source

Overall results of the AMSTAR 2 and GRADE recommendations for narrative reviews.

, 2022
Overall results of the AMSTAR 2 and GRADE recommendations for narrative reviews.
Kevin L. de Keijzer (12152139), Marco Beato (360499), Javier Raya Gonzalez (12152142)   +2 more
core   +1 more source

Association Between Prospective Registration and Quality of Systematic Reviews in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-epidemiological Study

Frontiers in Medicine, 2021
Background: We sought to investigate the methodological and reporting quality of published systematic reviews describing randomized controlled trials in type 2 diabetes mellitus and analyze their association with status of protocol registration.Methods ...
Qiuyi Zheng, Qiuyi Zheng, Fenghua Lai, Bin Li, Jia Xu, Jianyan Long, Sui Peng, Yanbing Li, Yihao Liu, Yihao Liu, Haipeng Xiao   +10 more
doaj   +1 more source

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR

BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2018
Background Systematic reviews (SRs) in the field of neuropathic pain (NeuP) are increasingly important for decision-making. However, methodological flaws in SRs can reduce the validity of conclusions.
Svjetlana Dosenovic, Antonia Jelicic Kadic, Katarina Vucic, Nikolina Markovina, Dawid Pieper, Livia Puljak   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer – A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment of Meta-Analyses

Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 2022
Objective To assess the quality of recent meta-analyses reviewing the diagnostic utility of sentinel node biopsy in endometrial cancer. Methods With the MeSH terms endometrial neoplasms and sentinel lymph node biopsy, PubMed and Embase databases were ...
Mario Arturo González Mariño
doaj   +1 more source

Quality and characteristics of studies that reported they were conducted in line with the AMSTAR 2: a cross-sectional study

, 2023
AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews), a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews (SRs), was published in 2007 [1]. An updated version of the tool, AMSTAR 2, was published in September 2017 as an updated version of the tool ...
Mate Todorić, Ruzica Bojcic, Livia Puljak   +2 more
core   +1 more source

AMSTAR-2 assessment.

, 2019
AMSTAR-2 assessment.
Chiara Arienti (411051), Stefano Negrini (3485102), Stefano G. Lazzarini (7010813), Alex Pollock (3945407)   +3 more
core   +1 more source

Rationale, completeness and quality of evidence for the use of ursodeoxycholic acid in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia

Педиатрическая фармакология
Background. Systematic reviews are considered the highest evidence of the effectiveness and safety of treatment methods used in clinical practice. The veracity of a results and conclusions of systematic reviews is directly related to their quality.
Olesya V. Zakharova
doaj   +1 more source