Results 41 to 50 of about 11,780 (189)

AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews.

, 2023
AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews.
Chenlong Xie (6795659), Jiangang Song (3771355), Xing Li (134367), Pan Wei (4023668), Liyue Lu (15999207), Jian Wang (5901), Yalan Zhou (7838885), Zhiyu Yin (3750052), Yue Yong (8203299), Hao Gao (154820)   +9 more
core   +1 more source

Reliability, usability and coverage of AMSTAR 2 assessing 544 systematic reviews and meta analysis reports - protocol for a descriptive analytic study [PDF]

, 2023
Background: The AMSTAR 2 tool (second version of Assessing Methodological Quality in Systematic Reviews) is useful for critical appraisal of systematic reviews of clinical trials.
Ribeiro, Johanne Periera, Gluud, Christian, Lee, Zheng Yii, Riberholt, Christian Gunge, Milan, Joachim Birch, Olsen, Markus Harboe, Lew, Charles Chin Han   +6 more
core   +1 more source

Reporting and methodological quality of systematic literature reviews evaluating the associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking behaviors: a systematic quality review

Harm Reduction Journal, 2021
Introduction Several published systematic reviews have examined the potential associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking, but their methodological and/or reporting quality have not yet been assessed.
Mimi M. Kim, Lynley Pound, Isabella Steffensen, Geoffrey M. Curtin   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

AMSTAR-2 overall confidence ratings (from Shea et al. [22]).

, 2022
AMSTAR-2 overall confidence ratings (from Shea et al. [22]).
Brenda S. Bauer (12569129), Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe (4344979), Colin McCowan (434192), Amaya Azcoaga-Lorenzo (11137953), Utkarsh Agrawal (9459874)   +4 more
core   +1 more source

The AMSTAR-2 critical appraisal tool and editorial decision-making for systematic reviews: Retrospective, bibliometric study

, 2022
AMSTAR-2 is a critical appraisal instrument for systematic reviews and may have a role in editorial processes. This study explored whether associations exist between AMSTAR-2 assessments and editorial decisions.
de Groof, E. Joline, Keane, Celia, Dossa, Fahima, Chapman, Stephen J., van Ramshorst, Gabrielle H., Smart, Neil J.   +5 more
core   +1 more source

External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR). [PDF]

PLoS ONE, 2007
BACKGROUND: Thousands of systematic reviews have been conducted in all areas of health care. However, the methodological quality of these reviews is variable and should routinely be appraised.
Beverley J Shea, Lex M Bouter, Joan Peterson, Maarten Boers, Neil Andersson, Zulma Ortiz, Tim Ramsay, Annie Bai, Vijay K Shukla, Jeremy M Grimshaw   +9 more
doaj   +1 more source

Methodological quality assessment of reviews based on AMSTAR-2 criteria (k = 16).

, 2023
Methodological quality assessment of reviews based on AMSTAR-2 criteria (k = 16).
Susanne Heumann (12519040), Sophie Alina Schneider (14664747), Silke Pawils (3819565), Daniel Mays (4263028), Franka Metzner (3819562)   +4 more
core   +1 more source

Overall results of the AMSTAR 2 and GRADE recommendations for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

, 2022
Overall results of the AMSTAR 2 and GRADE recommendations for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Kevin L. de Keijzer (12152139), Marco Beato (360499), Javier Raya Gonzalez (12152142)   +2 more
core   +1 more source

Acupuncture for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

International Journal of General Medicine, 2022
Liuying Li,1 Lanying Yang,2 Biao Luo,2 Lvyu Deng,2 Yue Zhong,2 Daohui Gan,2 Xiaohan Wu,2 Peimin Feng,1 Fengya Zhu2 1Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China; 2Traditional Chinese Medicine ...
Li L, Yang L, Luo B, Deng L, Zhong Y, Gan D, Wu X, Feng P, Zhu F   +8 more
doaj  

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis in Spine Surgery—How Good Are They in Methodological Quality? A Systematic Review

Global Spine Journal, 2021
Study Design: Systematic review. Objectives: To assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery over the past 2 decades.
Muthu Sathish MS Ortho,, Ramakrishnan Eswar MBBS   +1 more
doaj   +1 more source