Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention studies in periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools. [PDF]
J Clin Exp Dent, 2023 Systematic reviews of intervention studies are used to support treatment recommendations. The aim of this study was to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of systematic reviews of intervention studies in in the field of periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS.Systematic reviews of randomized and non-randomized clinical trials, published ...
Pereira AG +8 more
europepmc +7 more sources
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2023 A measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) was originally developed for systematic reviews (SRs) of health-care interventions. The aim of this study was to assess the applicability of AMSTAR 2 to SRs of non-intervention studies.This was a meta-research study.
Livia Puljak +2 more
exaly +6 more sources
Editorial Perspective: Time for Another Grading System—From PRISMA to AMSTAR 2 [PDF]
Global Spine Journal, 2020 Jens R. Chapman
doaj +5 more sources
A Russian version of AMSTAR 2: validation and guidance
Эпидемиология и вакцинопрофилактика, 2022 Relevance. Determining the quality of a systematic review is known to be of the main criteria to consider when making a clinical decision. And various assessment tools allow you to determine this, both for the readers themselves and for those who write a
D. V. Kvashnina +4 more
doaj +2 more sources
What tool do undergraduate pharmacy students prefer when grading systematic review evidence: AMSTAR‐2 or ROBIS? [PDF]
Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods, 2023 Introduction While systematic reviews (SRs) are considered the highest form of evidence in the hierarchy, the quality and standard of reviews varies. Two quality assessment tools have been developed to assess the variation in such standards.
Shaun W. H. Lee
doaj +2 more sources
Different Approaches to Appraising Systematic Reviews of Digital Interventions for Physical Activity Promotion Using AMSTAR 2 Tool: Cross-Sectional Study [PDF]
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023 High-quality systematic reviews (SRs) can strengthen the evidence base for prevention and health promotion. A 16-item AMSTAR 2 tool allows the appraisal of SRs by deriving a confidence rating in their results.
Karina Karolina Kedzior, Katja Matthias
exaly +3 more sources
Moving towards accurate and transparent AMSTAR 2 ratings and correcting the record on Cochrane reviews [PDF]
BMC Medical Research MethodologyJuan Victor Ariel Franco, Jae Hung Jung
doaj +4 more sources
Use of AMSTAR-2 in the methodological assessment of systematic reviews: protocol for a methodological study. [PDF]
Ann Transl Med, 2020 Systematic reviews (SRs) with or without meta-analyses (MAs) are widely used in resolving questions in various healthcare areas (such as, traditional Chinese medicine, public health and surgery), and they are the cornerstone of evidence-based healthcare. However, the reliability of SRs is typically influenced by their methodological quality.
Lu C, Lu T, Ge L, Yang N, Yan P, Yang K.
europepmc +3 more sources
Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews [PDF]
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2021 Background AMSTAR-2 (‘A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews, version 2’) and ROBIS (‘Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews’) are independent instruments used to assess the quality of conduct of systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SR/MAs). The degree
Mateusz J. Swierz +12 more
doaj +2 more sources
Learned Publishing, 2022 AbstractAMSTAR‐2 is a critical appraisal instrument for systematic reviews and may have a role in editorial processes. This study explored whether associations exist between AMSTAR‐2 assessments and editorial decisions. A retrospective, cross‐sectional study of manuscripts submitted to a single journal between 2015 and 2017 was undertaken.
Stephen J. Chapman +5 more
openaire +3 more sources