Results 31 to 40 of about 12,174 (193)

The application of AMSTAR 2 in overviews of systematic reviews shows a need for improvement

European Journal of Public Health, 2021
Abstract Background Overviews of systematic reviews (SR) summarise and appraise the quality of research relevant for evidence-based decision-making. ‘A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews' (AMSTAR 2) is a valid and moderately reliable appraisal instrument with 16 items that can be used to ...
K Matthias, R Lorenz, KK De Santis
openaire   +1 more source

Methodological assessment of systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies

BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2022
Background Systematic reviews of in-vitro studies, like any other study, can be of heterogeneous quality. The present study aimed to evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies.
Christopher Hammel, Nikolaos Pandis, Dawid Pieper, Clovis Mariano Faggion   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

AMSTAR-2 items and frequency of responses.

, 2022
AMSTAR-2 items and frequency of responses.
Ali Khan (568900), Haley Riley (13864760), Ryan Ottwell (13777766), Wade Arthur (13864763), Ekaterina Shapiro (13864766), Drew Wright (10515311), Stacy Chronister (13864772), Suhao Chen (13864769), Benjamin Greiner (9160007), Matt Vassar (3233421), Micah Hartwell (10955487), Zhuqi Miao (6260939)   +11 more
core   +1 more source

AMSTAR-2 overall confidence ratings (from Shea et al. [22]).

, 2022
AMSTAR-2 overall confidence ratings (from Shea et al. [22]).
Brenda S. Bauer (12569129), Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe (4344979), Colin McCowan (434192), Amaya Azcoaga-Lorenzo (11137953), Utkarsh Agrawal (9459874)   +4 more
core   +1 more source

AMSTAR-2 quality appraisal questions and results for each included review.

, 2023
AMSTAR-2 quality appraisal questions and results for each included review.
Sarah Sowden (4241689), Amber Sacre (17628044), Josephine M. Wildman (17628047), Natalie Bennett (5057339), Clare Bambra (3572648), Adam Todd (3572645), Katie Thomson (3572651)   +6 more
core   +1 more source

AMSTAR-2 domains.

, 2022
(DOCX)
Ruijuan Han (13114859), Zhi Zhang (55283), Hongxia Zhang (164388), Meimei Chai (14135255), Jiang Zheng (1402621), Jie Deng (190312)   +5 more
core   +1 more source

Measuring test-retest reliability (TRR) of AMSTAR provides moderate to perfect agreement – a contribution to the discussion of the importance of TRR in relation to the psychometric properties of assessment tools

BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2021
Background Systematic Reviews (SRs) can build the groundwork for evidence-based health care decision-making. A sound methodological quality of SRs is crucial.
Stefanie Bühn, Peggy Ober, Tim Mathes, Uta Wegewitz, Anja Jacobs, Dawid Pieper   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Methodological quality of systematic reviews in dentistry including animal studies: a cross-sectional study

Irish Veterinary Journal, 2023
Background The overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews including animal models can be heterogeneous. We assessed the methodological quality of systematic reviews including animal models in dentistry as well as the overall confidence in ...
Max C. Menne, Naichuan Su, Clovis M. Faggion   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

AMSTAR-2 rating [32].

, 2022
(TIFF)
Pragya Malla (11914299), Rupesh Kumar Yadav (11914296), Pawan Kumar Hamal (5979230)   +2 more
core   +1 more source

Reporting and methodological quality of systematic literature reviews evaluating the associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking behaviors: a systematic quality review

Harm Reduction Journal, 2021
Introduction Several published systematic reviews have examined the potential associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking, but their methodological and/or reporting quality have not yet been assessed.
Mimi M. Kim, Lynley Pound, Isabella Steffensen, Geoffrey M. Curtin   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source