Results 51 to 60 of about 12,174 (193)

Association Between Prospective Registration and Quality of Systematic Reviews in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-epidemiological Study

open access: yesFrontiers in Medicine, 2021
Background: We sought to investigate the methodological and reporting quality of published systematic reviews describing randomized controlled trials in type 2 diabetes mellitus and analyze their association with status of protocol registration.Methods ...
Qiuyi Zheng   +10 more
doaj   +1 more source

AMSTAR-2 tool for quality assessment.

open access: yes, 2023
Source: The authors (2022). (PDF)
Helena de Fátima Nunes Silva (14593090)   +4 more
core   +1 more source

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR

open access: yesBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2018
Background Systematic reviews (SRs) in the field of neuropathic pain (NeuP) are increasingly important for decision-making. However, methodological flaws in SRs can reduce the validity of conclusions.
Svjetlana Dosenovic   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer – A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment of Meta-Analyses

open access: yesRevista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 2022
Objective To assess the quality of recent meta-analyses reviewing the diagnostic utility of sentinel node biopsy in endometrial cancer. Methods With the MeSH terms endometrial neoplasms and sentinel lymph node biopsy, PubMed and Embase databases were ...
Mario Arturo González Mariño
doaj   +1 more source

Quality and characteristics of studies that reported they were conducted in line with the AMSTAR 2: a cross-sectional study

open access: yes, 2023
AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews), a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews (SRs), was published in 2007 [1]. An updated version of the tool, AMSTAR 2, was published in September 2017 as an updated version of the tool ...
Mate Todorić   +2 more
core   +1 more source

Identification and Assessment of Systematic Reviews for Evidence-Based Guideline Recommendations on Follow-Up of Preterm Born Children: A Mapping Review. [PDF]

open access: yesActa Paediatr
ABSTRACT Aim This mapping review presents a systematic approach identifying aggregated evidence and assessing methodological quality. Methods MEDLINE (via Ovid), Epistemonikos and the Cochrane database were searched for systematic reviews, with or without meta‐analyses, published from 2010 to May 6, 2025, addressing any interventions, prognosis, risks,
Kaiser G   +5 more
europepmc   +2 more sources

Methods used for adjusting AMSTAR 2 when assessing non-effectiveness systematic reviews: a meta-research protocol

open access: yes, 2022
AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) tool for critical appraisal of systematic reviews (SRs) was published in 2007 and has since grown to be one of the most used SR appraisal tools [1] .
Aleksandar Kirkovski   +3 more
core   +1 more source

AMSTAR-2 assessment.

open access: yes, 2019
AMSTAR-2 assessment.
Chiara Arienti (411051)   +3 more
core   +1 more source

Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis with protocols in Diabetes Mellitus Type II: A systematic review.

open access: yesPLoS ONE, 2020
BackgroundSystematic reviews with or without meta-analyses (SR/MAs) are strongly encouraged to work from a protocol to facilitate high quality, transparent methodology.
Daniel Christopher Rainkie   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Quality of the Evidence Supporting the Role of Acupuncture for Stable Angina Pectoris: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews

open access: yesFrontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2021
Background: To systematically appraise and synthesize evidence, we conducted an overview of systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) on acupuncture for stable angina pectoris (SAP).Methods: Eight databases were searched for SRs/MAs of acupuncture on ...
Min Shen   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy