Results 61 to 70 of about 12,174 (193)

Methodological quality assessment of reviews based on AMSTAR-2 criteria (k = 16).

, 2023
Methodological quality assessment of reviews based on AMSTAR-2 criteria (k = 16).
Susanne Heumann (12519040), Sophie Alina Schneider (14664747), Silke Pawils (3819565), Daniel Mays (4263028), Franka Metzner (3819562)   +4 more
core   +1 more source

Acupuncture for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

International Journal of General Medicine, 2022
Liuying Li,1 Lanying Yang,2 Biao Luo,2 Lvyu Deng,2 Yue Zhong,2 Daohui Gan,2 Xiaohan Wu,2 Peimin Feng,1 Fengya Zhu2 1Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China; 2Traditional Chinese Medicine ...
Li L, Yang L, Luo B, Deng L, Zhong Y, Gan D, Wu X, Feng P, Zhu F   +8 more
doaj  

Additional file 2: of Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR

, 2018
Interrater agreement (Cohenâ s kappa) for AMSTAR. (DOCX 22 kb)
Dosenovic, Svjetlana, Jelicic Kadic, Antonia, Vucic, Katarina, Markovina, Nikolina, Pieper, Dawid, Puljak, Livia   +5 more
openaire   +1 more source

Overall results of the AMSTAR 2 and GRADE recommendations for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

, 2022
Overall results of the AMSTAR 2 and GRADE recommendations for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Kevin L. de Keijzer (12152139), Marco Beato (360499), Javier Raya Gonzalez (12152142)   +2 more
core   +1 more source

Influence of Methodological Expertise on Assessment of Systematic Review Searches using PRISMA and AMSTAR

, 2022
Many studies have assessed PRISMA compliance of systematic reviews in biomedical disciplines, including items relating to information sources and search strategies.
Melissa Rethlefsen, Shelley de Kock
core   +2 more sources

Impact of industry sponsorship on the quality of systematic reviews of vaccines: a cross-sectional analysis of studies published from 2016 to 2019

Systematic Reviews, 2022
Background Systematic reviews (SRs) provide the highest level of evidence and inform evidence-based decision making in health care. Earlier studies found association with industry to be negatively associated with methodological quality of SRs.
Dawid Pieper, Irma Hellbrecht, Linlu Zhao, Clemens Baur, Georgia Pick, Sarah Schneider, Thomas Harder, Kelsey Young, Andrea C. Tricco, Ella Westhaver, Matthew Tunis   +10 more
doaj   +1 more source

Kanglaite (Coix Seed Extract) as Adjunctive Therapy in Cancer: Evidence Mapping Overview Based on Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analyses

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2022
Background: Several quantitative systematic reviews of Kanglaite (KLT), an herb preparation used to treat cancer and malignant pleural effusion, have been published in recent years.
Cuncun Lu, Shuilin Wu, Lixin Ke, Fumei Liu, Wenru Shang, Wenru Shang, Xiuxiu Deng, Yanli Huang, Qiang Zhang, Xin Cui, Alexios-Fotios A. Mentis, Yanming Xie, Zhifei Wang   +12 more
doaj   +1 more source

Bewertung der methodischen Qualität systematischer Übersichtsarbeiten mit AMSTAR 2

, 2020
Beschreibung: Die Bewertung der methodischen Qualität systematischer Übersichtsarbeiten muss vielfach durchgeführt werden, wie z.B. in Leitlinien oder Overviews. AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) war bis vor einigen Jahren das am häufigsten verwendete Instrument[zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene URL]
Pieper, D, Matthias, K, Jacobs, A, Wegewitz, U   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Patient and public involvement in randomized trials of lifestyle intervention among pregnant women with obesity: An umbrella review

International Journal of Gynecology &Obstetrics, EarlyView.
Abstract Background Obesity increases the risk of obstetric and neonatal complications, and adherence to lifestyle interventions during pregnancy presents a challenge. Patient and public involvement (PPI) in trials may foster a more patient‐centered approach, potentially improving compliance with intervention and follow up.
Elisabeth Garcia Vilaplana, Andrea Vigaray Galera, Carmen Amezcua‐Prieto, Khalid Saeed Khan, Aurora Bueno‐Cavanillas, Begoña Martínez de Tejada, Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez   +6 more
wiley   +1 more source

Adapted rating of the quality of reviews, based on AMSTAR-2 [43].

, 2023
Adapted rating of the quality of reviews, based on AMSTAR-2 [43].
Susanne Heumann (12519040), Sophie Alina Schneider (14664747), Silke Pawils (3819565), Daniel Mays (4263028), Franka Metzner (3819562)   +4 more
core   +1 more source