Results 41 to 50 of about 12,174 (193)

Results of the AMSTAR-2 assessments.

, 2022
Results of the AMSTAR-2 assessments.
Brenda S. Bauer (12569129), Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe (4344979), Colin McCowan (434192), Amaya Azcoaga-Lorenzo (11137953), Utkarsh Agrawal (9459874)   +4 more
core   +1 more source

AMSTAR-2 checklist.

, 2022
(PDF)
Brenda S. Bauer (12569129), Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe (4344979), Colin McCowan (434192), Amaya Azcoaga-Lorenzo (11137953), Utkarsh Agrawal (9459874)   +4 more
core   +1 more source

Result of the AMSTAR-2 assessments.

, 2022
Result of the AMSTAR-2 assessments.
Ruijuan Han (13114859), Zhi Zhang (55283), Hongxia Zhang (164388), Meimei Chai (14135255), Jiang Zheng (1402621), Jie Deng (190312)   +5 more
core   +1 more source

AMSTAR 2 assessment of the included systematic reviews.

, 2023
AMSTAR 2 assessment of the included systematic reviews.
Renan Souza (8709633), Sinval Adalberto Rodrigues-Junior (17328329), Fernando Schorr Grossl (9072691), Ana Paula Maihack Gauer (17328323), Clodoaldo Antônio de Sá (17328326), Cristiano Padilha (17328320)   +5 more
core   +1 more source

Role of Acupuncture in the Treatment of COPD: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

International Journal of General Medicine, 2021
Liu Chun,1 Xuanlin Li,2 Zhenzhen Feng,2 Yang Xie,3 Jiansheng Li2,3 1Longhua Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, People’s Republic of China; 2Co-Construction Collaborative Innovation Center for Chinese ...
Chun L, Li X, Feng Z, Xie Y, Li J
doaj  

The reliability, usability, and applicability of tools to appraise quality and risk of bias in systematic reviews: a prospective evaluation of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS

, 2020
Background/research question: Readers of systematic reviews (SRs) and overview authors require valid, reliable, and practical means to evaluate the methodological quality and risk of bias of SRs. To evaluate and compare the interrater and inter-centre reliability, usability, and applicability[for full text, please go to the a.m. URL]
Gates, M, Gates, A, Prediger, B, Becker, M, Duarte, G, Cary, M, Vandermeer, B, Fernandes, R, Pieper, D, Hartling, L   +9 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Acupuncture for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

International Journal of General Medicine, 2021
Jixin Chen,1,2,* Aifeng Liu,1,2,* Qinxin Zhou,1,2 Weijie Yu,1,2 Tianci Guo,1,2 Yizhen Jia,1,2 Kun Yang,1,2 Puyu Niu,1,2 Huichuan Feng1,2 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese ...
Chen J, Liu A, Zhou Q, Yu W, Guo T, Jia Y, Yang K, Niu P, Feng H   +8 more
doaj  

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis in Spine Surgery—How Good Are They in Methodological Quality? A Systematic Review

Global Spine Journal, 2021
Study Design: Systematic review. Objectives: To assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery over the past 2 decades.
Muthu Sathish MS Ortho,, Ramakrishnan Eswar MBBS   +1 more
doaj   +1 more source

AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews.

, 2023
AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews.
Chenlong Xie (6795659), Jiangang Song (3771355), Xing Li (134367), Pan Wei (4023668), Liyue Lu (15999207), Jian Wang (5901), Yalan Zhou (7838885), Zhiyu Yin (3750052), Yue Yong (8203299), Hao Gao (154820)   +9 more
core   +1 more source

Reliability, usability and coverage of AMSTAR 2 assessing 544 systematic reviews and meta analysis reports - protocol for a descriptive analytic study [PDF]

, 2023
Background: The AMSTAR 2 tool (second version of Assessing Methodological Quality in Systematic Reviews) is useful for critical appraisal of systematic reviews of clinical trials.
Ribeiro, Johanne Periera, Gluud, Christian, Lee, Zheng Yii, Riberholt, Christian Gunge, Milan, Joachim Birch, Olsen, Markus Harboe, Lew, Charles Chin Han   +6 more
core   +1 more source