Results 51 to 60 of about 845,583 (301)
A Third Route to the Doomsday Argument [PDF]
In this paper, I present a solution to the Doomsday argument based on a third type of solution, by contrast to on the one hand, the Carter-Leslie view and on the other hand, the Eckhardt et al. analysis.
Paul Franceschi, Franceschi, Paul
core
The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument
The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument share certain structural features, and hence are often discussed together (Bostrom 2003, Are you living in a computer simulation, Philosophical Quarterly, 53:243–255; Aranyosi 2004, The Doomsday Simulation Argument. Or why isn’t the end nigh, and you’re not living in a simulation, http:
openaire +3 more sources
ABSTRACT Background Children with sickle cell anemia (SCA) in low‐income settings are at risk of severe malnutrition, but optimal nutritional management has not been established. We evaluated an intensified ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) regimen in children with persistent severe malnutrition after initial treatment and assessed whether early ...
Safiya Gambo +9 more
wiley +1 more source
Multi-argument classification for semantic role labeling [PDF]
This paper describes a Multi-Argument Classification (MAC) approach to Semantic Role Labeling. The goal is to exploit dependencies between semantic roles by simultaneously classifying all arguments as a pattern.
Smith, Tony C., Lin, Chi-San Althon
core +1 more source
Kenneth L. Pearce’ta Dinî Tecrübe ve Açıklama Gücü
Natüralizm ve teizm, insanoğlunun evrene ve olgulara dair hakikati kavrama çabasının ürünü olan karşıt iki dünya görüşüdür. Natüralist dünya görüşünde hakikat tabiattan ibarettir.
Süleyman Altın
doaj +1 more source
Locative-Related Roles and the Argument-Adjunct Distinction in Balinese
This paper uses the realisation of locative-related roles in Balinese to show that there is no clear-cut distinction between arguments and adjuncts, supporting the gradient nature of grammatical functions (cf. Croft 2001; Langacker 1987; Aarts 2007).
I Wayan Arka
doaj +1 more source
The aim of this paper is to adapt Miranda Fricker’s concept of testimonial injustice to cases of what I call “argumentative injustice”: those cases where an arguer’s social identity brings listeners to place too much or little credibility in an argument.
Patrick Bondy
doaj +1 more source
Central Nervous System Tumors Among Infants in Canada: A Report From CYP‐C
ABSTRACT Background Central nervous system (CNS) tumors in infants are rare, pose unique clinical challenges, and lack large‐scale evidence‐based data to guide management. This study seeks to describe CNS tumors in Canadian infants and to compare their outcomes with those of older children.
Samuel Sassine +17 more
wiley +1 more source
Plural marking in argument supporting nominalizations [PDF]
This paper investigates the conditions under which Argument Supporting Nominalizations (ASNs) can receive plural marking. Under ASNs, we discuss deverbal nouns that express an event and preserve argument structure.
Alexiadou, Artemis +2 more
core
Comparative Drug Response Profiling in Neuroblastoma Cell Lines and Patient‐Derived Tumor Organoids
ABSTRACT High‐risk neuroblastoma remains a leading cause of pediatric cancer mortality, and improved preclinical models are needed to guide therapeutic developments. We screened seven high‐risk neuroblastoma cell lines and three patient‐derived tumor organoids with 528 compounds alongside bone marrow controls, and compared them with external datasets ...
Krzysztof Wierbiłowicz +12 more
wiley +1 more source

