Results 1 to 10 of about 16,600,438 (304)
Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument [PDF]
Informal Logic, 2004 A critical examination of the dialectical approach, focusing on a comparison ofthe illative and the dialectical definitions of argument. I distinguish a moderate, a strong and a hyper dialectical conception of argument.
Maurice A. Finocchiaro
doaj +6 more sources
Informal Logic, 2010 We are all familiar with the traditional conception of what makes for a good argument: that its premises are true and that it is valid.[1] That traditional view of the goodness of arguments has sustained serious criticism over the past few decades, so ...
Patrick Bondy
doaj +4 more sources
ARGAEL: ARGument Annotation and Evaluation tooL
SoftwareX, 2023 Argument mining aims to automatically extract structured argumentative information existing in natural language text, and it is commonly performed by machine and deep learning models that require accurately and meaningfully labeled corpora. In this paper,
Andrés Segura-Tinoco, Iván Cantador
doaj +3 more sources
Argument Evaluation Contest Results
Informal Logic, 1991 In Vol. XI, No.1, this journal announced an argument analysis contest. Two eminent colleagues agreed to serve as judges-Professor Henry W. Johnstone, Jr. and Professor Michael Scriven. In short order, four entries were received and sent off to the judges,
Jonathan E. Adler
doaj +3 more sources
Evaluating Argumentative Discourse Processes
Studies in Logic, Grammar and RhetoricThis paper sets out basic principles for the interpretation and assessment of contextual factors in argumentative discourse, which may be combined with argumentation norms to build a system of argument evaluation. The theoretical background is given, and
Hinton Martin
doaj +2 more sources
Pebbling Arguments for Tree Evaluation [PDF]
, 2013 The Tree Evaluation Problem was introduced by Cook et al. in 2010 as a candidate for separating P from L and NL. The most general space lower bounds known for the Tree Evaluation Problem require a semantic restriction on the branching programs and use a ...
Liu, David
core +2 more sources
Knowing, Thinking, and Learning
Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 2022 We examined the relationship between the levels of sophistication (high-sophisticated and low-sophisticated) of students’ domain general epistemic beliefs and an important component of students’ critical thinking skills—their ability to evaluate ...
Srikanth Dandotkar +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Frontiers in Communication, 2022 We study the influence of argument sources on argument quality evaluations. Argument source refers to the person who present the argument. We ask whether partial, impartial and reluctant sources generate different evaluations of argument quality.
Kaisa Herne +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Annotating Argument Schemes [PDF]
, 2021 Argument schemes are abstractions substantiating the inferential connection between premise(s) and conclusion in argumentative communication. Identifying such conventional patterns of reasoning is essential to the interpretation and evaluation of ...
Lawrence, John +4 more
core +5 more sources