Results 251 to 260 of about 16,600,438 (304)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Argument evaluation in multi-agent justification logics
Logic Journal of the IGPL, 2019Argument evaluation , one of the central problems in argumentation theory, consists in studying what makes an argument a good one. This paper proposes a formal approach to argument evaluation from the perspective of justification logic.
A. Burrieza, Antonio Yuste-Ginel
semanticscholar +1 more source
Evaluating science arguments: Evidence, uncertainty, and argument strength.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2009Public debates about socioscientific issues are increasingly prevalent, but the public response to messages about, for example, climate change, does not always seem to match the seriousness of the problem identified by scientists. Is there anything unique about appeals based on scientific evidence-do people evaluate science and nonscience arguments ...
Adam, Corner, Ulrike, Hahn
openaire +2 more sources
Collective argument evaluation as judgement aggregation
Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2010A conflicting knowledge base can be seen abstractly as a set of arguments and a binary relation characterising conflict among them. There may be multiple plausible ways to evaluate conflicting arguments. In this paper, we ask: given a set of agents, each
Iyad Rahwan, F. Tohmé
semanticscholar +1 more source
Analysing and Evaluating Argumentation in Planning [PDF]
Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1998 Recent developments in textual analysis in the social sciences can be used to analyse the phenomenon called the ‘argumentative’ or ‘communicative’ turn by, for example, Patsy Healey.
openaire +1 more source
Evaluation Utilization as Argumentation
Evaluation, 2002Evaluation utilization is discussed in this article from an argumentative perspective. Rather than regarding evaluative information as indisputable knowledge, it is viewed as a collection of arguments, which can be debated, accepted and disputed. Approaching from this perspective, evaluations consist of different kinds of statements, which become ...
openaire +1 more source
Analysis and Evaluation of Argumentative Discourse
2009Although Renkema’s Introduction to Discourse Studies (2004: Chap. 12) provides a useful introduction to the study of argumentation, this brief account does not provide a full characterization of the field. Among the dominant approaches to argumentative discourse a general distinction can be made between dialectical approaches, which view argumentation ...
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen
openaire +4 more sources
Evidence and Argument Evaluation
2016This chapter confronts the central problem in the current state of argumentation studies, that of clarifying the relationship between argument and evidence. This problem was posed in Chaps. 5 and 6, where the notions of argument and evidence were notably prominent in the use of forensic evidence in the case of the Leonardo Da Vinci portrait and also in
openaire +1 more source
Effects of Text Content and Beliefs on Informal Argument Evaluation
, 2017Michael B. W. Wolfe, Todd J. Williams
semanticscholar +1 more source