Results 31 to 40 of about 16,600,438 (304)
Aspect-Controlled Neural Argument Generation [PDF]
We rely on arguments in our daily lives to deliver our opinions and base them on evidence, making them more convincing in turn. However, finding and formulating arguments can be challenging.
Benjamin Schiller +2 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
An independent axiomatisation for free short-circuit logic [PDF]
Short-circuit evaluation denotes the semantics of propositional connectives in which the second argument is evaluated only if the first argument does not suffice to determine the value of the expression.
Ponse, Alban, Staudt, Daan J. C.
core +3 more sources
An Epistemological Approach to Argumentation
The evaluation of arguments and argumentation is best understood epistemologically. Epistemic circularity is not formally defective but it may be epistemologically objectionable.
Alvin I. Goldman
doaj +1 more source
Numerical calculation of Bessel, Hankel and Airy functions
The numerical evaluation of an individual Bessel or Hankel function of large order and large argument is a notoriously problematic issue in physics. Recurrence relations are inefficient when an individual function of high order and argument is to be ...
Abramowitz +51 more
core +1 more source
From chunks to function-argument structure : a similarity-based approach [PDF]
Chunk parsing has focused on the recognition of partial constituent structures at the level of individual chunks. Little attention has been paid to the question of how such partial analyses can be combined into larger structures for complete utterances ...
Hinrichs, Erhard, Kübler, Sandra
core +4 more sources
An exploratory test of an intuitive evaluation method of perceived argument strength
According to Mercier and Sperber (2009, 2011, 2017), people have an immediate and intuitive feeling about the strength of an argument. These intuitive evaluations are not captured by current evaluation methods of argument strength, yet they could be ...
Jos Hornikx +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Generating and evaluating evaluative arguments
AbstractEvaluative arguments are pervasive in natural human communication. In countless situations people attempt to advise or persuade their interlocutors that something is desirable (vs. undesirable) or right (vs. wrong). With the proliferation of on-line systems serving as personal advisors and assistants, there is a pressing need to develop general
Carenini, Giuseppe, Moore, Johanna D.
openaire +1 more source
Peer review and citation data in predicting university rankings, a large-scale analysis [PDF]
Most Performance-based Research Funding Systems (PRFS) draw on peer review and bibliometric indicators, two different method- ologies which are sometimes combined.
A Baccini +11 more
core +2 more sources
Arguing from Hazard Analysis in Safety Cases: A Modular Argument Pattern
We observed that safety arguments are prone to stay too abstract, e.g. solutions refer to large packages, argument strategies to complex reasoning steps, contexts and assumptions lack traceability.
Carlan, Carmen, Gleirscher, Mario
core +1 more source
Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme [PDF]
Toulmin's scheme for the layout of arguments (1958) represents an influential tool for the analysis of arguments. The scheme enriches the traditional premises-conclusion model of arguments by distinguishing additional elements, like warrant, backing and rebuttal. The present paper contains a formal elaboration of Toulmin's scheme, and extends it with a
openaire +3 more sources

