Results 31 to 40 of about 1,331,962 (291)
Peer review and citation data in predicting university rankings, a large-scale analysis [PDF]
Most Performance-based Research Funding Systems (PRFS) draw on peer review and bibliometric indicators, two different method- ologies which are sometimes combined.
A Baccini +11 more
core +2 more sources
Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme [PDF]
Toulmin's scheme for the layout of arguments (1958) represents an influential tool for the analysis of arguments. The scheme enriches the traditional premises-conclusion model of arguments by distinguishing additional elements, like warrant, backing and rebuttal. The present paper contains a formal elaboration of Toulmin's scheme, and extends it with a
openaire +3 more sources
Virtues Suffice for Argument Evaluation
The virtues and vices of argument are now an established part of argumentation theory. They have helped direct attention to hitherto neglected aspects of how we argue.
Andrew Aberdein
doaj +1 more source
Considering Carneades as a Framework for Informal Logic: A Reply to Walton and Gordon
The paper offers a critical analysis of the research program for formalizing informal logic proposed by Douglas Walton and Thomas Gordon (forthcoming). Since their proposal is based on employing the Carneades Argumentation System (CAS), this paper aims ...
Marcin Selinger, Marcin Koszowy
doaj +3 more sources
O(1) Computation of Legendre polynomials and Gauss-Legendre nodes and weights for parallel computing [PDF]
A self-contained set of algorithms is proposed for the fast evaluation of Legendre polynomials of arbitrary degree and argument is an element of [-1, 1].
Bogaert, Ignace +2 more
core +1 more source
ABSTRACT Primary lung carcinomas and bronchial carcinoid tumors (BC) are very rare malignancies in childhood. While typical BC and mucoepidermoid carcinomas are mostly low‐grade, localized tumors with a more favorable prognosis than in adults, necessitating avoidance of overtreatment, adenocarcinomas of the lung are often diagnosed at advanced disease ...
Michael Abele +19 more
wiley +1 more source
Multi-argument classification for semantic role labeling [PDF]
This paper describes a Multi-Argument Classification (MAC) approach to Semantic Role Labeling. The goal is to exploit dependencies between semantic roles by simultaneously classifying all arguments as a pattern.
Lin, Chi-San Althon, Smith, Tony C.
core
Arguing from Hazard Analysis in Safety Cases: A Modular Argument Pattern
We observed that safety arguments are prone to stay too abstract, e.g. solutions refer to large packages, argument strategies to complex reasoning steps, contexts and assumptions lack traceability.
Carlan, Carmen, Gleirscher, Mario
core +1 more source
ABSTRACT Pediatric gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP‐NENs) are extremely rare and clinically heterogeneous. Management has largely been extrapolated from adult practice. This European Standard Clinical Practice Guideline (ESCP), developed by the EXPeRT network in collaboration with adult NEN experts, provides (adult) evidence ...
Michaela Kuhlen +23 more
wiley +1 more source
Treatment Decision‐Making Roles and Preferences Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer
ABSTRACT Background Decision‐making (DM) dynamics between adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, parents, and oncologists remain underexplored in diverse populations. We examined cancer treatment DM preferences among an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse group of AYAs and their parents.
Amanda M. Gutierrez +14 more
wiley +1 more source

