Results 31 to 40 of about 16,600,438 (304)

Aspect-Controlled Neural Argument Generation [PDF]

open access: yesNorth American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020
We rely on arguments in our daily lives to deliver our opinions and base them on evidence, making them more convincing in turn. However, finding and formulating arguments can be challenging.
Benjamin Schiller   +2 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

An independent axiomatisation for free short-circuit logic [PDF]

open access: yes, 2017
Short-circuit evaluation denotes the semantics of propositional connectives in which the second argument is evaluated only if the first argument does not suffice to determine the value of the expression.
Ponse, Alban, Staudt, Daan J. C.
core   +3 more sources

An Epistemological Approach to Argumentation

open access: yesInformal Logic, 2004
The evaluation of arguments and argumentation is best understood epistemologically. Epistemic circularity is not formally defective but it may be epistemologically objectionable.
Alvin I. Goldman
doaj   +1 more source

Numerical calculation of Bessel, Hankel and Airy functions

open access: yes, 2011
The numerical evaluation of an individual Bessel or Hankel function of large order and large argument is a notoriously problematic issue in physics. Recurrence relations are inefficient when an individual function of high order and argument is to be ...
Abramowitz   +51 more
core   +1 more source

From chunks to function-argument structure : a similarity-based approach [PDF]

open access: yes, 2001
Chunk parsing has focused on the recognition of partial constituent structures at the level of individual chunks. Little attention has been paid to the question of how such partial analyses can be combined into larger structures for complete utterances ...
Hinrichs, Erhard, Kübler, Sandra
core   +4 more sources

An exploratory test of an intuitive evaluation method of perceived argument strength

open access: yesStudies in Communication Sciences, 2022
According to Mercier and Sperber (2009, 2011, 2017), people have an immediate and intuitive feeling about the strength of an argument. These intuitive evaluations are not captured by current evaluation methods of argument strength, yet they could be ...
Jos Hornikx   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Generating and evaluating evaluative arguments

open access: yesArtificial Intelligence, 2006
AbstractEvaluative arguments are pervasive in natural human communication. In countless situations people attempt to advise or persuade their interlocutors that something is desirable (vs. undesirable) or right (vs. wrong). With the proliferation of on-line systems serving as personal advisors and assistants, there is a pressing need to develop general
Carenini, Giuseppe, Moore, Johanna D.
openaire   +1 more source

Peer review and citation data in predicting university rankings, a large-scale analysis [PDF]

open access: yes, 2018
Most Performance-based Research Funding Systems (PRFS) draw on peer review and bibliometric indicators, two different method- ologies which are sometimes combined.
A Baccini   +11 more
core   +2 more sources

Arguing from Hazard Analysis in Safety Cases: A Modular Argument Pattern

open access: yes, 2017
We observed that safety arguments are prone to stay too abstract, e.g. solutions refer to large packages, argument strategies to complex reasoning steps, contexts and assumptions lack traceability.
Carlan, Carmen, Gleirscher, Mario
core   +1 more source

Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme [PDF]

open access: yesArgumentation, 2005
Toulmin's scheme for the layout of arguments (1958) represents an influential tool for the analysis of arguments. The scheme enriches the traditional premises-conclusion model of arguments by distinguishing additional elements, like warrant, backing and rebuttal. The present paper contains a formal elaboration of Toulmin's scheme, and extends it with a
openaire   +3 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy