Results 121 to 130 of about 323,287 (167)
Commentary: Without Values, Complexity is Reduced to Mathematics. [PDF]
J Eval Clin PractGreenhalgh T.
europepmc +1 more source
Navigating the boundary between 'normative' and 'non-normative' collective action: A British case study of the removal of a public statue associated with racism. [PDF]
Br J Soc PsycholDixon J +6 more
europepmc +1 more source
Unseeing urban divides in Luanda and Maputo. [PDF]
Environ Plan DSchubert J, Sumich J.
europepmc +1 more source
When Rituals Fail: Rationalization, Bayesianism, and Predictive Processing. [PDF]
Evol AnthropolHong Z.
europepmc +1 more source
The Citizens' Distributional Preferences for Health Care Resource Allocations: The Non-Negligible Role of Option Value. [PDF]
Health EconHansen LD, Kjær T, Gyrd-Hansen D.
europepmc +1 more source
Why are RCTs the Gold Standard? The Epistemological Difference Between Randomized Experiments and Observational Studies. [PDF]
Obs StudHarshaw C.
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
A Bayesian approach to the argument from ignorance.
Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 2004In this paper, we re-examine a classic informal reasoning fallacy, the so-called argumentam ad ignorantiam. We argue that the structure of some versions of this argument parallels examples of inductive reasoning that are widely viewed as unproblematic. Viewed probabilistically, these versions of the argument from ignorance constitute a legitimate form ...
Mike Oaksford, Ulrike Hahn
openaire +2 more sources
2022
Abstract This chapter presents a case in which a preventable tragedy occurs and raises the question of who, if anyone, is to blame for it. Many of those who contributed to the tragedy were ignorant of the fact that they were doing so, and it is clear that some of these people therefore have an excuse for their behavior.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract This chapter presents a case in which a preventable tragedy occurs and raises the question of who, if anyone, is to blame for it. Many of those who contributed to the tragedy were ignorant of the fact that they were doing so, and it is clear that some of these people therefore have an excuse for their behavior.
openaire +1 more source
2015
This chapter contends that the argument from ignorance has an important role to play in a theory of public health reasoning. Typically, this argument involves a single premise to the effect that there is no evidence / proof / knowledge that x is true. From this premise is drawn the conclusion that x is false.
openaire +1 more source
This chapter contends that the argument from ignorance has an important role to play in a theory of public health reasoning. Typically, this argument involves a single premise to the effect that there is no evidence / proof / knowledge that x is true. From this premise is drawn the conclusion that x is false.
openaire +1 more source