Results 261 to 270 of about 7,262,487 (298)

Argument Quality in Public Deliberations

Argumentation and Advocacy, 2008
ARGUMENT QUALITY IN PUBLIC DELIBERATIONS Theorists and activists increasingly frame their preferred forms of politics as "deliberative democracy" (Dryzek, 1990, 2000; Gastil & Keith, 2005). Understanding citizen deliberation as political action is neither a novel idea nor exclusive to western political systems.
Timothy Steffensmeier, William Schenck-Hamlin   +1 more
exaly   +2 more sources

Argument Quality and Cultural Difference

Argumentation, 1999
Central to argumentation theory is a concern with normativity. Argumentation theorists are concerned, among other things, with explaining why some arguments are good (or at least better than others) in the sense that a given argument provides reasons for embracing its conclusion which are such that a fair- minded appraisal of the argument yields the ...
Siegel, Harvey
openaire   +2 more sources

Cross-Domain Argument Quality Estimation

Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, 2023
1343513448Argumentation is one of society's foundational pillars, and, sparked by advances in NLP, and the vast availability of text data, automated mining of arguments receives increasing attention.
Michael Fromm 0001, Max Berrendorf, Evgeniy Faerman, Thomas Seidl 0001   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Quality-Aware Ranking of Arguments

Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 2020
Argument search engines identify, extract, and rank the most important arguments for and against a given controversial topic. A number of such systems have recently been developed, usually focusing on classic information retrieval ranking methods that are based on frequency information. An important aspect that has been ignored so far by search engines
Lorik Dumani, Ralf Schenkel
openaire   +2 more sources

Quality of Argument

2021
This chapter focuses on the process of developing arguments, which is one of the key aims of critical thinking. Simple arguments comprise three elements: a claim, at least one premise, and a link between them. The claim is the ‘answer’ to the question, which some call the position, conclusion, or contention.
openaire   +1 more source

Quality of Service and the End-to-End Argument

IEEE Network, 2007
Audio-visual services are now commonly used on the Internet. Many of them are based on batch downloading of contents for later replay. Real-time interactive and streaming services are now rapidly becoming popular. These services would benefit from quality of service if it were widely provided.
Gunnar Karlsson, Ignacio Más Ivars
openaire   +2 more sources

Do incompatible arguments cause extensive processing in the evaluation of arguments? The role of congruence between argument compatibility and argument quality

British Journal of Psychology, 2015
Previous studies have demonstrated that arguments incompatible with prior beliefs are subjected to more extensive refutational processing, scrutinized longer, and judged to be weaker than arguments compatible with prior beliefs. However, this study suggests whether extensive processing is implemented when evaluating arguments is not decided by argument
Cheng-Hong, Liu, Hung-Wei, Lee, Po-Sheng, Huang, Hsueh-Chih, Chen, Scott, Sommers   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

AQUAPLANE: The Argument Quality Explainer App

Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2023
Sebastian Britner, Lorik Dumani, Ralf Schenkel   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

On the Argumentative Quality of Explanatory Narratives

2003
This article tentatively draws together the three concepts of argumentation, narrative and explanation. The three concepts are all highly rich ones and denote complex areas. Some parts of each conception may have implications for or illuminate the other two — that will depend on what one takes each of them to be, and on the perspective one chooses to ...
openaire   +1 more source