Results 91 to 100 of about 1,332,288 (370)
Macrostructure of the parliament debates and some of their linguistic features on sintagmatically-lexical level [PDF]
The beginning of studying argumentation stems from the time of Old Greece and the development of rhetoric as discipline. Contemporary argumentation theory is based on Aristotle's rhetoric.
Vojinović-Kostić Jelena
doaj
Most autophagic cell death studies lack evidence of causality
Of 104 studies claiming autophagic cell death (ACD), only 13 demonstrated both causality and exclusion of apoptosis to confirm true ACD. Most studies relied on correlation‐level data or measured autophagy in isolation, revealing pervasive methodological shortcomings.
Ali Burak Özkaya, Yasmin Ghaseminejad
wiley +1 more source
21st-century education directs learners to develop the skills of argumentation. Argumentation skills are the intellectual abilities involved in solving problems, making judgments and decisions, and formulating ideas and beliefs.
Resti Lutfiani+2 more
doaj +1 more source
On the Difference between Assumption-Based Argumentation and Abstract Argumentation [PDF]
Acknowledgements The first author has been supported by the National Research Fund, Luxembourg (LAAMI project) and by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC, UK), grant ref. EP/J012084/1 (SAsSy project).
Alcântara, João+3 more
core +1 more source
Microbial profile of the appendix niche in acute appendicitis: a novel sampling approach
This study utilized a novel sampling method, ERAT (i.e. endoscopic retrograde appendicitis treatment)‐guided lumen aspiration, to obtain samples from the appendix, and shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed for in situ characterization of the appendix microbiome in patients with acute appendicitis.
Huimin Ma+10 more
wiley +1 more source
Beyond p‐values: Assessing clinical significance in acupuncture research
Abstract In acupuncture randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the proper interpretation of results requires a thorough understanding of key statistical concepts such as p‐value, effect size, and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). This paper explores the relationships among these metrics and their implications for assessing the clinical ...
Changzhen Gong
wiley +1 more source
Report on argumentation and teacher education in Europe [PDF]
This document will ultimately form part of a comprehensive package of materials for teacher education and professional development in argumentation.
Blake, Allan+3 more
core
The Diagnostic Value of Visual Evoked Potentials in Chronic Disorders of Consciousness
ABSTRACT Objective In chronic disorders of consciousness (DOCs), the distinction between vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) and minimally conscious state (MCS) is as crucial as it is challenging. Evoked potentials (EPs) and event‐related potentials (ERPs) are helpful, but some limitations prevent their consistent use in the ...
Letizia Clementi+14 more
wiley +1 more source
Argumentación: Hacia Un Esquema Conceptual
RESUMEN Estudio de la argumentación desde la conceptualización, las estructuras argumentativas, la tipología argumental, las funciones, la organización secuencial, las condiciones y estilos de la argumentación, el emisor y el receptor en la ...
Jesús Portillo Fernández
doaj
ABSTRACT Objective The characteristics and utility of composite progression independent of relapse activity (cPIRA; worsening on the Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS], or 9‐Hole Peg Test, or Timed 25‐Foot Walk Test) were evaluated as an endpoint in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) trials using the ENSEMBLE (NCT03085810) and pooled OPERA I/II ...
Ludwig Kappos+11 more
wiley +1 more source