Results 121 to 130 of about 114,690 (292)

Emotions, Argumentation and Argumentativity

open access: yesInformal Logic, 2019
The present paper examines how discursive representations and emotive constructions underpin an argumentative dynamic that emerges from apparently non-argumentative statements, like those found in newspaper headlines. Our data comes from Greek broadsheet newspapers in the polarized context of the Greek crisis. First, we outline an analytic synergy that
Thierry Herman, Dimitris Serafis
openaire   +1 more source

Human Pegivirus Encephalitis With Brain Detection and Response to Sofosbuvir Ledipasvir

open access: yesAnnals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Human pegivirus (HPgV‐1) has been associated with severe encephalomyelitis in immunocompromised patients. Its neurological spectrum remains poorly defined. We report a slowly progressive encephalitis in a person living with well‐controlled HIV, characterized by white matter abnormalities and inflammatory cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). HPgV RNA was
Antoine Moulignier   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

Ways of artistic argumentation in the artistic creativity of Tatiana Tolstaya

open access: yesRussian Language Studies, 2013
The article deals with the peculiarities of argumentation in the artistic texts of Tatiana Tolstaya’s creative work including her symbolic argumentation.
I M Popova, E V Lubeznaya
doaj  

Incorporating generative conversational agents into collaborative argumentation: Do different customization strategies matter?

open access: yesEducational Technology & Society
Collaborative argumentation allows groups to express, criticize, and integrate arguments to achieve the co-construction of collective knowledge. However, students often face challenges when proposing diversified arguments, gathering evidence, and ...
Xin Cui, Zhi-Qiang Ma, Xin-Ya You, Yuchen Chen, Jia-Jia Yao, Yun-Fang Tu
doaj   +1 more source

Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation

open access: yesArtificial Intelligence, 2003
AbstractThe present paper discusses experimental argument assistance tools. In contrast with automated reasoning tools, the objective is not to replace reasoning, but to guide the user's production of arguments. Two systems are presented, Argue! and ArguMed based on DefLog. The focus is on defeasible argumentation with an eye on the law.
openaire   +1 more source

Bi‐ and Mono‐Allelic RFC1 Expansion in a North American Cohort With Idiopathic Axonal Neuropathy

open access: yesAnnals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Objective RFC1 biallelic repeat expansion is increasingly recognized as a cause of chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP), but it remains challenging to know who to test. This study aims to determine the prevalence of biallelic and monoallelic RFC1 expansions and their corresponding neuropathy phenotypes in CIAP patients and identify ...
Amro M. Stino   +25 more
wiley   +1 more source

Implementing classroom action research to strengthen argumentation skills: training for chemistry educators in Mojokerto

open access: yesAbdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang
Improving teacher competency is more effective when supported by continuous professional development. This Community Service Program continues previous activities in 2024, which focused on training chemistry teachers to develop argumentation-based ...
Amiq Fikriyati   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Factors Associated With the Rising Trend in Self‐Reported Cognitive Disability Among U.S. Adults Aged 18–39 From 2013–2024

open access: yesAnnals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Objective Building on our prior Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System analysis identifying adults aged 18–39 as the primary driver of the national increase in self‐reported cognitive disability, we examined factors associated with this rise using 2013–2024 U.S. BRFSS data. Methods We analyzed U.S.
Adam de Havenon   +9 more
wiley   +1 more source

On the instantiation of argument-incomplete argumentation frameworks

open access: yes, 2023
Argument-incomplete argumentation frameworks provide an intuitive way of representing uncertainty in argumentative contexts. It is however possible that, taking structured argumentation as a reference point, the general assumptions of these models present the same risks of hasty generalization attributed to some abstract argumentation models, as they ...
Carlo Proietti, Antonio Yuste-Ginel
openaire   +3 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy