Results 121 to 130 of about 117,409 (298)
Emotions, Argumentation and Argumentativity
The present paper examines how discursive representations and emotive constructions underpin an argumentative dynamic that emerges from apparently non-argumentative statements, like those found in newspaper headlines. Our data comes from Greek broadsheet newspapers in the polarized context of the Greek crisis. First, we outline an analytic synergy that
Thierry Herman, Dimitris Serafis
openaire +1 more source
Argumentation-Based Contract Monitoring in Uncertain Domains [PDF]
Few existing argumentation frameworks are designed to deal with probabilistic knowledge, and none are designed to represent possibilistic knowledge, making them unsuitable for many real world domains.
Preece, Alun David +6 more
core
Sertraline Treatment Can Mimic Niemann‐Pick Type C Biomarker Profile: A Diagnostic Pitfall
ABSTRACT Background Oxysterols (cholestane‐3β,5α,6β‐triol and 7‐ketocholesterol) and N‐palmitoyl‐O‐phosphocholineserine (PPCS) are sensitive biomarkers for Niemann‐Pick disease type C (NPC) screening. However, false‐positive results occur, with a biomarker profile suggestive of NPC despite the absence of pathogenic variants in genes involved in NPC or ...
Maria Makrygianni +19 more
wiley +1 more source
Argumentation skills are crucial for students to analyze and evaluate complex information. This study was conducted to determine the argumentation pattern and quality of students' argumentation through STEM-EDP learning, namely, designing a simple ...
Andina Armelia +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation
AbstractThe present paper discusses experimental argument assistance tools. In contrast with automated reasoning tools, the objective is not to replace reasoning, but to guide the user's production of arguments. Two systems are presented, Argue! and ArguMed based on DefLog. The focus is on defeasible argumentation with an eye on the law.
openaire +1 more source
ABA: Argumentation Based Agents
Many works have identified the potential benefits of using argumentation in multiagent settings, as a way to implement the capabilities of agents (eg. decision making, communication, negotiation) when confronted with specific multiagent problems. In this
Kakas, A. +12 more
core +1 more source
ABSTRACT Objective We aim to comprehensively analyze how regional tumor and edema characteristics are associated with clinical presentations and survival outcomes in a large cohort of glioblastoma patients. Methods Patients with IDH‐wildtype glioblastoma who received brain MRI from 2010 to 2023 were included.
Daniel J. Zhou +16 more
wiley +1 more source
Collaborative argumentation allows groups to express, criticize, and integrate arguments to achieve the co-construction of collective knowledge. However, students often face challenges when proposing diversified arguments, gathering evidence, and ...
Xin Cui, Zhi-Qiang Ma, Xin-Ya You, Yuchen Chen, Jia-Jia Yao, Yun-Fang Tu
doaj +1 more source
Legal Facts in Argumentation-Based Litigation Games
This paper analyzes legal fact-argumentation in the framework of the argumentation-based litigation game (ALG) by Xiong (Leg Sci 370(9):16–19, 2012). Rather than as an ontological one, an ALG treats a legal fact as a fact-qua-claim whose acceptability ...
Frank Zenker +6 more
core +1 more source
Long‐Term Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Autoimmune Autonomic Ganglionopathy—A 10‐Year Follow Up Study
ABSTRACT Objective Autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy (AAG) is a rare but potentially treatable cause of severe autonomic failure. Evidence guiding long‐term immunotherapy, treatment sequencing, and residual autonomic impairment is limited. We evaluated long‐term treatment response, residual autonomic dysfunction, and relapse patterns in patients with
Giacomo Chiaro +6 more
wiley +1 more source

