Results 251 to 260 of about 2,211 (278)
Paraconsistent argumentation schemes [PDF]
Web Intelligence, 2016 Various types of everyday arguments are represented as argumentation schemes, originating from the Legal Argumentation literature. The recent achievements in this domain can be applied to multi-agent settings to enrich the paradigmatic aspects of communication and reasoning.
Barbara Dunin-Keplicz, Alina Strachocka
openaire +2 more sources
Interpretative Argumentation Schemes
, 2014 This paper presents a set of argumentation schemes that can be used to identify, analyze and evaluate types of arguments characteristically used in cases of contested statutory interpretation in law. These schemes represent forms of argument already identified in the literature as leading forms of argument used in cases of statutory interpretation ...
Douglas Walton +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2009 Legal reasoning typically requires a variety of argumentation schemes to be used together. A legal case may raise issues requiring argument from precedent cases, rules, policy goals, moral principles, jurisprudential doctrine, social values and evidence.
Thomas F. Gordon, Douglas Walton
openaire +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Argumentation Schemes in Persuasive Brochures
Argumentation, 2004Many public information documents attempt to persuade the recipients that they should engage in or refrain from specific behaviour. This is based on the assumption that the recipient will decide about his or her behaviour on the basis of the information given and a rational evaluation of the pros and cons. An analysis of 20 public information brochures
Peter Jan Schellens, Menno D T De Jong
exaly +4 more sources
Computationally-Friendly Argumentation Schemes
2014 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT), 2014In an agent activity both paradigmatic aspects of communication and reasoning can be naturally enriched by argumentation. The contribution of this research is a computationally-friendly framework for formalizing paraconsistent argumentation schemes in information-rich environments.
Alina Strachocka
exaly +2 more sources
Meta-level Argumentation with Argument Schemes
2013Arguments in real-world decision making, for example in medical or engineering domains, are often based on patterns of informal argumentation, called argument schemes. In order to improve automated tool support of decision making in such domains, a formal model of argument schemes appears necessary.
Jann Müller +2 more
openaire +1 more source
2008
This book provides a systematic analysis of many common argumentation schemes and a compendium of 96 schemes. The study of these schemes, or forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, is at the core of argumentation research. Surveying all aspects of argumentation schemes from the ground up, the book takes the reader from
Douglas Walton +2 more
openaire +1 more source
This book provides a systematic analysis of many common argumentation schemes and a compendium of 96 schemes. The study of these schemes, or forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, is at the core of argumentation research. Surveying all aspects of argumentation schemes from the ground up, the book takes the reader from
Douglas Walton +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Argumentation Schemes for Stress Inference
Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceAlison R Panisson, Panisson Alison R
exaly +2 more sources
Argumentation Schemes for Legal Presumption of Causality
Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2023Causal reasoning is a challenging topic not only in philosophy, science and in theories of human mind, but also in legal reasoning. Causality is indeed a key precondition for civil and criminal liability, in all cases dealing with the connection between human actions or omissions and harmful events.
Ruta Liepina +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Hybrid Reasoning with Argumentation Schemes
2008Practical reasoning typically requires a variety of argumentation schemes to be used together to solve problems and make decisions. For example, a legal case may raise issues requiring argument from precedent cases, rules, policy goals, moral principles, jurisprudential doctrine, social values and evidence. This tutorial presents an introduction to the
Gordon Thomas F., Fokus Fraunhofer
openaire +1 more source