Results 1 to 10 of about 8,487 (301)
Argumentation structures in legal dossiers [PDF]
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, 2007 This paper argues that the best chance of utilising AI & Law models of legal argument in practice in the near future may be in desiging legal argumentation management systems. Such systems do not have a knowledge base and inference engine but allow the user to structure a legal case dossier in terms of the argumentation structure of a case, so that
Jobien Sombekke +2 more
core +8 more sources
Argumentation and explanation in the law [PDF]
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2023 This article investigates the conceptual connection between argumentation and explanation in the law and provides a formal account of it. To do so, the methods used are conceptual analysis from legal theory and formal argumentation from AI.
Antonino Rotolo +2 more
doaj +2 more sources
Hypotheses and their dynamics in legal argumentation [PDF]
Expert Systems With Applications, 2019 Abstract We investigate some legal interpretation techniques from the viewpoint of the Argentinian jurisprudence. This allows the proposal of a logical framework –from a computer science perspective– for modeling such specific reasoning techniques towards an appropriate construction of legal arguments.
Martin O Moguillansky +2 more
exaly +3 more sources
Analyzing Legal Argumentation: What Theoretical Model Is the Most Comprehensive?
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 2022 Today, there is a clear need in developing a unified theoretical model of legal argumentation viable for all areas of legal practice and legal doctrine.
Tamara Dudash
doaj +1 more source
Legal Inquiry and Legal Arguments [PDF]
Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 2022 Legal Inquiry and Legal Arguments Del Mar’s conception of legal inquiry sheds light on aspects of judicial decision-making, in particular their use of some argument-types. In turn, the deeper insight into these argumentative practices helps us better understand how legal arguments put forward in authoritatively decided cases relate to future ...
openaire +1 more source
Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law
Bratislava Law Review, 2021 Although the legal context is a formalized framework, in judicial proceedings there is also room for multi-modal argumentation. To the traditional logical mode, multi-modal argumentation theory has added three additional modes (the so-called “alternate ...
Marko Novak
doaj +1 more source
Reviewing Argument Schemes for Legal Arguments of Statutory Interpretation
Opinión Jurídica, 2022 The current legal paradigm assumes that legal decisions must be justified. Judges use arguments as tools to accomplish this justification. Thus, this research presents an analysis to explain and illustrate arguments of statutory interpretation, given ...
Eduardo Brandão Nunes
doaj +1 more source
Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial, 2022 All sharia economic court decisions in Indonesia are supposed to include sharia principles as the basis for adjudicating the case. Therefore, the judges must be able to understand the legal norms of sharia economics.
Muhammad Taufiki +2 more
doaj +1 more source
The latitude of logic in legal hermeneutics [PDF]
Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Nišu, 2014 Legal hermeneutics (the interpretation of law] has always taken a highly significant place in general hermeneutics. The interpretation of laws involves an intricate task of determining the real meaning or rationale of legal norms.
Medar Suzana
doaj +1 more source
Rooting Gilbert's Multi-Modal Argumentation in Jung, and Its Extension to Law
Informal Logic, 2020 This paper discusses how an understanding of Jung's psychological types is important for the relevance of Gilbert's multi-modal argumentation theory. Moreover, it highlights how the types have been confirmed by contemporary neuroscience and cognitive ...
Marko Novak
doaj +1 more source