Results 11 to 20 of about 3,299 (264)
Teisinis samprotavimas: argumentacinis metodologinis požiūris
Teisinis argumentavimas, samprotavimas, teisės aiškinimas – susiję, sutampantys, o kartais tapatinami teise grįsto sprendimo priėmimo proceso aspektai. Lietuviškoje teisės doktrinoje plačiau analizuojama teisės aiškinimo, interpretavimo problematika, o ...
Eglė Mackuvienė
doaj +1 more source
The article discusses topics in the context of contemporary legal argumentation. It starts with a sketch of the development of topics from ancient times until the present day.
Guenther Kreuzbauer
doaj +1 more source
The Relevance of Liturgies in the Courts of Classical Athens [PDF]
What was the function of classical Athenian courts? Did they intend to enforce the rule of law? The greatest obstacle to accepting an affirmative answer is the wide use of, at first sight and from a modern (sometimes anachronistic) perspective, remotely ...
Vasileios Adamidis
doaj +1 more source
The inextricable entanglement of argumentation and interpretation in law [PDF]
At the basis of tireless efforts to explain the nature of law lies the question of how judges should decide cases. Therefrom arises a need for a theory that would clarify the role of the courts and, moreover, provide guidance to them on reaching
Marković Miloš
doaj +1 more source
Statement Types in Legal Argument [PDF]
In this paper we present an overview of the process of argumentation with legal cases, from evidence to verdict. We identify the various different types of statement involved in the various stages, and describe how the various types relate to one another.
Latifa Al-Abdulkarim +2 more
openaire +1 more source
PENAFSIRAN, PENALARAN, DAN ARGUMENTASI HUKUM YANG RASIONAL
Indonesia applys civil law system which emphasizes on written law. This is why almost ail Indonesian positive laws are written law. Implementation of written laws needs rational legal interpretation, legal reasoning and legal argumentation in order to be
Tommy Hendra Purwaka
doaj +1 more source
Characteristics of argumentation in general which impact legal argumentation
In this article it is claimed that legal argumentation should part from principles contained in argumentation in general. Therefore, it should be adapted to argumentative criterions which take into account the logic component (as a product), rhetoric (as
Juan Manuel Peña Castaño
doaj +1 more source
The Rationality of Legal Discourse in Habermas's Discourse Theory
This paper argues that Habermas's conception of the rationality of moral and legal discussions has import for argumentation theorists interested in the rationality of public deliberations in politics and law.
Eveline T. Feteris
doaj +1 more source
Narrativity of Legal Language in Law-Making Processes [PDF]
The paper concerns the relation between argumentative and narrative features of legal texts and the question whether legal texts can be perceived as narrative texts.
Paweł Skuczyński
doaj +1 more source
Ad Absurdum Argumentation in Law; A Study of its Nature, Bases and Function [PDF]
Argument is live of law, explaining the correct way of legal reasoning is of great importance in deducting legal judgment. Sometimes, it is practically useful to prove a proposition indirectly rather than directly.
Heidar Piri
doaj +1 more source

