Results 31 to 40 of about 8,487 (301)
The argumentation in workplace accident trials. The case of the civil court of Mons (1870-1904)
Clio@Themis, 2021 At the end of the nineteenth century, workplace accident trials increased significantly in number in Belgium and in other European countries. These cases are interesting, as they have a hybrid character, with a unique blend of industrial and legal ...
Bruno Debaenst
doaj +1 more source
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Objective We aim to comprehensively analyze how regional tumor and edema characteristics are associated with clinical presentations and survival outcomes in a large cohort of glioblastoma patients. Methods Patients with IDH‐wildtype glioblastoma who received brain MRI from 2010 to 2023 were included.
Daniel J. Zhou +16 more
wiley +1 more source
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, 2023 Legal-political Ideas as Elements of Argumentation in Court Speeches – Remarks on the Communists’ Trials in Lwów (1922–1923) The legacy of legal-political ideologists is seldom used as an element of
Marcin Niemczyk
doaj +1 more source
FILSAFAT HUKUM: Aktualisasi Critical Legal Studies Di Indonesia
Al-Manhaj, 2022 This paper discusses Critical Legal Studies as a critical study of law that opposes the school of legal formalism. As a critical study, Critical Legal Studies accommodates not only Marxist legal ideas, but also liberal-radical and postmodernism.
Dudang Gojali
doaj +1 more source
Advanced Robotics Research, EarlyView.A soft robotic simulator is developed to replicate the digital removal of feces (DRF), a sensitive yet essential nursing procedure. Integrating soft actuators, sensors, and a realistic rectal model, the simulator balances functional fidelity with perceptual realism. Engineering evaluations and nurse feedback confirm its potential to enhance training in
Shoko Miyagawa +10 more
wiley +1 more source
The South African Constitutional Court Experience: Reasoning Patterns Based on Foreign Law
Utrecht Law Review, 2012 This article aims to analyse the phenomenon of the diffusion of interpretive paradigms or argumentation models between constitutional courts. This phenomenon involves the importation of parameters - defined here as extra-systemic to a specific legal ...
Andrea Lollini
doaj +1 more source
Advanced Science, EarlyView.We investigate whether Montessori and traditional schooling systems shape the developmental trajectory of large‐scale brain dynamics in different ways. We quantify the arrow of time (“non‐reversibility”) in neural activity during resting state and movie‐watching, revealing distinct maturational patterns.
Elvira del Agua +6 more
wiley +1 more source
Legal Reasoning: Logic, Interpretation and Argumentation
Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia, 2018 The present work will investigate in the most important aspects of the logic of the reasonable, in which the argument plays a fundamental role and while the juridical interpretation, is not alien. Legal reasoning seeks as the ultimate goal the search for
Mabell Abigail Lagla Pillajo
doaj +1 more source
Organoid Brain‐Machine‐Interface Devices for Central Nervous System Repair
Advanced Science, EarlyView.We envision organoid brain‐machine‐interface (Organoid‐BMI) devices as new biohybrid bidirectional communication pathways to connect the human CNS and the external world for personalized CNS repair and regeneration. ABSTRACT Central nervous system (CNS) repair and regeneration suffer from tremendous clinical challenges due to current limitations in ...
Yantao Xing +10 more
wiley +1 more source
La recatégorisation comme procédé argumentatif dans le domaine juridique
Argumentation et Analyse du Discours, 2014 In this study, we seek to understand and describe how disagreement between judges is handled in a deliberation on a given case in the context of a Brazilian Court of Appeal. Using a transcript of a trial dealing with moral damage (or the so-called “price
Rubens Damasceno Morais
doaj +1 more source