Results 301 to 310 of about 6,787,949 (343)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Policy Theory as Argumentation
Review of Policy Research, 1994This article presents a method to reconstruct policy theories as argumentations, illustrated by road safety policies in the Netherlands. A policy theory is defined as an actor's integrated set of assumptions with regard to a policy. To date, the literature on policy theories has not applied reconstruction methods so that the assumptions of an actor ...
Igno M. A. M. Pröpper+1 more
openaire +2 more sources
An Argument for the Identity Theory
Journal of Philosophy, 1966Abstract Lewis offers a functionalist argument for the type‐type psychophysical identity theory, according to which, as a matter of fact, mental experiences are type‐identical with certain neuro‐chemical brain states. Lewis summarizes his argument as follows: “The definitive characteristic of any (sort of) experience as such is its ...
openaire +2 more sources
, 2015
ions such as "culture" and "society" (Chapter 1). People are multivalent; society is balkanized into discourse domains. The relationship between individuals and social worlds cannot therefore be a simple, universal one.
C. Willard
semanticscholar +1 more source
ions such as "culture" and "society" (Chapter 1). People are multivalent; society is balkanized into discourse domains. The relationship between individuals and social worlds cannot therefore be a simple, universal one.
C. Willard
semanticscholar +1 more source
A Refined Concept of A Fortiori Arguments for Argumentation Theory
ArgumentationThe main goal of the paper is to provide the theoretical model for the a fortiori argument. After a brief history of a fortiori argument (especially in the works of Aristotle, Alexander, Cicero, and Boethius) we propose its general concept, components, and argumentation schemes, its classification, and finally, criteria for assessment.
Igor Martinjak, Jakub Pruś
openaire +2 more sources
A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory
2019In From argument schemes to argumentative relations in the wild we have brought together a variety of contributions to argumentation theory that we want to bring to the attention of the international community of argumentation scholars and students of argumentation.
van Eemeren, F.H., Garssen, B.
openaire +3 more sources
Arguments for the Davidsonian Theory
2000In this lecture, I will introduce the (neo)-Davidsonian theory of event arguments, and discuss several of the arguments that Terry Parsons gives in Parsons 1990 in favor of this theory. I will discuss some details of Parsons’ own proposal in the next lecture.
openaire +2 more sources
Preferences in Argumentation Theory
2011Argumentation theory is a reasoning process based on constructing arguments, determining conflicts between arguments and determining acceptable arguments. Dung’s argumentation framework is an abstract framework based on a set of arguments and a binary defeat relation defined over the set [12].
openaire +2 more sources
Building a Theory of Argumentation
2018In this chapter it is explained how the pragma-dialectical argumentation theory is built starting from four meta-theoretical principles which determine the methodological starting points of the theorizing. First the required functionalization of argumentation theory is discussed and it is described how this meta-theoretical principle is to be ...
Frans H. van Eemeren+1 more
openaire +2 more sources
What is the Theory Legal Argumentation For?
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 2019The paper aims to present the legal theories of legal argumentation constructed in the last century, organised into two groups: the precursors (Viehweg, Perelman and Toulmin) and the authors of the standard theory (MacCormick and Alexy). Then, some criticisms about all these conceptions are presented.
openaire +3 more sources
Some empirical qualifications to the arguments for an argumentative theory
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2011AbstractThe empirical research on the psychology of argumentation suggests that people are prone to fallacies and suboptimal performance in generating, comprehending, and evaluating arguments. Reasoning and argumentation are interrelated skills that use many of the same cognitive processes.
openaire +2 more sources