Results 111 to 120 of about 4,335 (155)
How hard is it to tell which is a Condorcet committee?
Darmann A.
europepmc +1 more source
A theory of measuring, electing, and ranking. [PDF]
Balinski M, Laraki R.
europepmc +1 more source
Performance metrics for the assessment of satellite data products: an ocean color case study. [PDF]
Seegers BN +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Identification of the Generalized Condorcet Winner in Multi-dueling Bandits
Haddenhorst, Björn +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Weak Condorcet winner(s) revisited
Public Choice, 2014A strong Condorcet winner (SCW) is an alternative, x, that a majority of voters rank higher than z, for every other alternative, z. A weak Condorcet winner (WCW) is an alternative, y, that no majority of voters rank below any other alternative, z, but is not a SCW.
T Nicolaus Tideman
exaly +2 more sources
Social Choice and Welfare, 2013
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Michael E Orrison
exaly +2 more sources
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Michael E Orrison
exaly +2 more sources
Ballot-polling Risk-limiting Audit for Selection of Condorcet Winner
2020 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), 2020An audit plays an important role as a corrective measure for verifying the election outcome. In this research, we define a ballot-polling risk-limiting audit procedure for the selection of Condorcet winner. We particularly look into BRAVO, a risk-limiting audit that examines samples per randomly-drawn individual ballot. We further conduct an experiment
Ari Saptawijaya
exaly +2 more sources

