Results 121 to 130 of about 94,619 (177)

Behavioural social choice: a status report. [PDF]

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2009
Regenwetter M, Grofman B, Popova A, Messner W, Davis-Stober CP, Cavagnaro DR.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Do design decisions depend on "dictators"? [PDF]

Res Eng Des, 2018
Broniatowski DA.
europepmc   +1 more source

The calculus of committee composition. [PDF]

PLoS One, 2010
Libby E, Glass L.
europepmc   +1 more source

How hard is it to tell which is a Condorcet committee?

Math Soc Sci, 2013
Darmann A.
europepmc   +1 more source

A theory of measuring, electing, and ranking. [PDF]

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007
Balinski M, Laraki R.
europepmc   +1 more source

The Jury Trial Reinvented

, 2021
Robertson CT, Shammas M.
europepmc   +1 more source

When are there Condorcet winners despite extremist preferences

, 2022
openaire   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Weak Condorcet winner(s) revisited

Public Choice, 2014
A strong Condorcet winner (SCW) is an alternative, x, that a majority of voters rank higher than z, for every other alternative, z. A weak Condorcet winner (WCW) is an alternative, y, that no majority of voters rank below any other alternative, z, but is not a SCW.
Dan S Felsenthal, Nicolaus Tideman, Felsenthal Dan S   +2 more
exaly   +4 more sources