Results 131 to 140 of about 94,619 (177)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Ballot-polling Risk-limiting Audit for Selection of Condorcet Winner

2020 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), 2020
An audit plays an important role as a corrective measure for verifying the election outcome. In this research, we define a ballot-polling risk-limiting audit procedure for the selection of Condorcet winner. We particularly look into BRAVO, a risk-limiting audit that examines samples per randomly-drawn individual ballot. We further conduct an experiment
Ari Saptawijaya
exaly   +3 more sources

A Note on the Probability of Having a Strong Condorcet Winner

open access: yesQuality and Quantity, 1999
In an election, a strong Condorcet winner is a candidate who is top-ranked by more than 50% of the voters. The purpose of this note is to provide some algebraic representations for the probability of having a strong Condorcet winner in three-candidate elections. Three alternative procedures for generating voting situations are considered: the Impartial
Dominique Lepelley, William V. Gehrlein
semanticscholar   +3 more sources

On the relationship of the Condorcet winner and positional voting rules

Mathematical Social Sciences, 1997
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Vincent Merlin
exaly   +3 more sources

On the Probability that all Weighted Scoring Rules Elect the Condorcet Winner

open access: yesQuality and Quantity, 1999
Many procedures exist to determine the winner in an election, and many studies have been done to determine conditions under which each of them would work best. Much less attention has been given to the examination of how frequently these procedures tend to produce the same winner.
W. Gehrlein
semanticscholar   +3 more sources

The probability of a Condorcet winner with a small number of voters

Economics Letters, 1998
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
W. Gehrlein
exaly   +4 more sources

1. Condorcet winner proportions

Social Choice and Welfare, 1986
J S Kelly, Kelly J S
exaly   +3 more sources

The Myth of the Condorcet Winner

Supreme Court Economic Review, 2012
There is consensus among legal scholars that, when choosing among multiple alternatives, the Condorcet winner, should it exist, is the preferred option. In this essay, I will refute that claim, both normatively and positively.
Paul H. Edelman
openaire   +2 more sources

Intermediate Condorcet Winners and Losers

Journal of Public Economic Theory, 2023
ABSTRACTThe conditions of strong Condorcet winner consistency and strong Condorcet loser consistency are, in essence, universally accepted as attractive criteria to evaluate the performance of social choice functions. However, there are many situations in which these conditions are silent because such winners and losers may not exist.
Salvador Barberà, Walter Bossert
openaire   +2 more sources

Sets of alternatives as Condorcet winners

open access: yesSocial Choice and Welfare, 2003
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Baris Kaymak, M. Remzi Sanver
openaire   +4 more sources

Which is better: the Condorcet or Borda winner?

Social Choice and Welfare, 2006
I address the two-century old question raised in the title and other social choice concerns while responding to Risse [11]; e.g., my paper, part of which is a written version of my 2004 Oberwolfach presentation, can be read independent of [11]. But first, the reader deserves an explanation. This exchange started when Risse's [10] paper was called to my
Donald G Saari, Saari Donald G
exaly   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy