Results 91 to 100 of about 44,893 (265)
Selinexor targets molecular pathways critical to myelofibrosis (MF) progenitor cell fitness and demonstrates complementary activity with ruxolitinib, supporting its potential as a novel disease‐modifying therapeutic strategy for MF. Summary Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by splenomegaly, constitutional ...
Trinayan Kashyap +7 more
wiley +1 more source
Diagnosis and management of neutropenia in adults: Expert guidance
Severe neutropenia can result from decreased production of neutrophil precursors in the bone marrow, as in the case of severe congenital neutropenia, or from increased utilization of neutrophils or their accelerated destruction as for drug‐induced neutropenia or autoimmune neutropenia. Severe chronic neutropenia increases susceptibility to bacterial or
Karl Welte +5 more
wiley +1 more source
In FMS‐like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)‐mutated relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia, gilteritinib, azacitidine and venetoclax is an effective salvage option with an ORR of 100% (mCRc [MLFS + CRc] 93%). Sixty‐two per cent of patients treated with intention‐to‐transplant proceeded to allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant, of whom 50% remain
Wei Yee Chan +19 more
wiley +1 more source
Background Clonal cytogenetic abnormalities in B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) include structural and numerical chromosomal alterations, where numerical are the most common aberrations.
Kiran Sachwani +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Summary The socioeconomic inequality in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) survival may be driven by differential access to intensive chemotherapy (ICT). We aimed to quantify socioeconomic inequality in the receipt of ICT among patients with AML in England and identify its key drivers. We evaluated 10 495 patients with de novo AML identified in the national
Koki Shimizu +4 more
wiley +1 more source
In patients with lenalidomide‐refractory multiple myeloma from the BOSTON trial subgroup analysis,1 selinexor (SEL) dose reduction versus full dosing substantially improved efficacy outcomes, including higher overall response rate (74.3% vs. 55.6%), deeper responses (≥ very good partial response: 48.6% vs.
Muhamed Baljevic
wiley +1 more source

