Results 41 to 50 of about 13,204 (193)
Nested Rules in Defeasible Logic [PDF]
, 2005 Defeasible Logic is a rule-based non-monotonic logic with tractable reasoning services. In this paper we extend Defeasible Logic with nested rules. We consider a new Defeasible Logic, called DL^ns, where we allow one level of nested rules.
A.E. Anderson, G. Antoniou, J. Gelati
core +1 more source
Being Wrong About Personal Transformation
European Journal of Philosophy, EarlyView.Abstract Transformative experiences are thought to change us in different ways. Some transform us epistemically by providing genuinely new, previously unimaginable experiences, while others bring about personal transformation by altering our values. Recent debates on transformative experiences have explored the challenges these experiences pose for ...
Adrian Kind
wiley +1 more source
Resource-driven Substructural Defeasible Logic
, 2018 Linear Logic and Defeasible Logic have been adopted to formalise different features relevant to agents: consumption of resources, and reasoning with exceptions.
DQ Pham +10 more
core +1 more source
European Journal of Philosophy, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Making sense of the world often requires one to come up with new ideas, including ideas one had previously been unable to think of. How and when should this be done? I propose and defend a norm of rationality linking wondering, belief, and abilities to conceive: one must not both wonder a question and reject all answers to it that one can ...
Michael Deigan
wiley +1 more source
Defeasible Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory
Informal LogicThere is a common understanding among logicians today that nonmonotonic types of reasoning, such as defeasible or presumptive, can clearly warrant a rational acceptance of its conclusion.
Muhammed Komath
doaj +1 more source
Suppositional Reasoning and Perceptual Justification [PDF]
, 2016 James Van Cleve raises some objections to my attempt to solve the bootstrapping problem for what I call “basic justification theories.” I argue that given 1 the inference rules endorsed by basic justification theorists, we are a priori (propositionally ...
Cohen, Stewart
core +1 more source
Progress, Objectivism, and Philosophy of History: the Problem of Progress in Critical Theory
European Journal of Philosophy, EarlyView.Abstract In this paper, I evaluate Rahel Jaeggi's theory of progress as outlined in her recent book Fortschritt und Regression. The central question of this paper will be whether Jaeggi's theory of progress in terms of an “accumulating problem‐solving process” can answer the critique of progress put forward by Amy Allen in The End of Progress.
Wouter Wiersma
wiley +1 more source
Argumentos Máximamente Específicos en Argumentación Rebatible
ManuscritoResumen DeLP (Defeasible Logic Programming) is a defeasible argumentation system that captures common sense reasoning features. Examples proposed in the literature show that DeLP gets counterintuitive results.
Cláudio Andrés Alessio
doaj +1 more source
Reasoning by Cases in Structured Argumentation
, 2017 We extend the $ASPIC^+$ framework for structured argumentation so as to allow applications of the reasoning by cases inference scheme for defeasible arguments.
Beirlaen, Mathieu +2 more
core +1 more source
Demo: Making Plans Scrutable with Argumentation and Natural Language Generation. [PDF]
, 2014 Peer reviewedPublisher ...
Kutlak, Roman, Tintarev, Nava
core +1 more source