Results 241 to 250 of about 14,940,574 (282)
Loss of IGF‐1R impairs DNA‐PKcs recruitment to chromatin leading to defective end‐joining
IGF‐1R promotes radioresistance by facilitating DNA‐PKcs recruitment to chromatin, enabling non‐homologous end‐joining (NHEJ) repair of double‐strand breaks. Inhibition or loss of IGF‐1R disrupts this recruitment to damage sites, driving compensatory reliance on microhomology‐mediated end‐joining (MMEJ) repair.
Matthew O. Ellis +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Pair‐wise comparison of the CellSearch and FETCH enrichment technologies for circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from metastatic breast, prostate, and small cell lung cancer patients shows an increased capture of CTCs using FETCH enrichment. The clinical implementation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) as a predictive tool for therapy efficacy in the ...
Michiel Stevens +6 more
wiley +1 more source
We identify USP29 as the only DUB mirroring CA9 expression, a marker of hypoxia and HIF pathway activation associated with PCA aggressiveness. USP29 stabilizes HIF‐1α and HIF‐2α via a noncanonical mechanism that is independent of PHD/pVHL activity yet relies on proteasomal regulation, establishing USP29 as a previously unrecognized regulator of hypoxic
Amelie S Schober +16 more
wiley +1 more source
Finding novel vulnerabilities of hypomorphic BRCA1 alleles
Synthetic lethality screens performed to identify novel vulnerabilities often model complete gene loss, thereby overlooking patient‐derived hypomorphic mutations. In this study, we have performed genome‐wide CRISPR screens on BRCA1 hypomorphic mutations, showing BRCA1I26A behaves like wild‐type, while BRCA1R1699Q mimics deficiency. Furthermore, we have
Anne Schreuder +10 more
wiley +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Molecular evidence on plant divergence times
American Journal of Botany, 2004Estimation of divergence times from sequence data has become increasingly feasible in recent years. Conflicts between fossil evidence and molecular dates have sparked the development of new methods for inferring divergence times, further encouraging these efforts. In this paper, available methods for estimating divergence times are reviewed, especially
Michael J Sanderson +2 more
exaly +3 more sources
The Exact Distribution of Divergence Times
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 2007The recent work of Haubold and Wiehe (Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1157-1160, 2001) considered statistical inference of the divergence time. However, there appears to be a fundamental flaw in the paper since it treated the divergence time as a random variable and not as a parameter.
Nadarajah, Saralees, Kotz, Samuel
openaire +2 more sources
Diverging times in movement analysis
Journal of Biomechanics, 2009In movement analysis, more than one measuring system is often used to record biomechanical variables. Usually, it is desired to assign the occurring events to a common time line, which can be accomplished by synchronizing data acquisition, i.e. using a pulse to trigger a sample on all systems.
Susanne W, Lipfert +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Conceptual issues in Bayesian divergence time estimation [PDF]
Bayesian inference of species divergence times is an unusual statistical problem, because the divergence time parameters are not identifiable unless both fossil calibrations and sequence data are available. Commonly used marginal priors on divergence times derived from fossil calibrations may conflict with node order on the phylogenetic tree causing a ...
Bruce Rannala
exaly +5 more sources
2005
Reevaluation of primate divergence times was necessary after it became obvious that the originally proposed dates are in conflict with the paleontological record. The recently established non-primate calibration points (AC-60 and ER-50)provide divergence times of eutherians and primates that are consistent with the fossil record.
A. Janke, U. Arnason
openaire +1 more source
Reevaluation of primate divergence times was necessary after it became obvious that the originally proposed dates are in conflict with the paleontological record. The recently established non-primate calibration points (AC-60 and ER-50)provide divergence times of eutherians and primates that are consistent with the fossil record.
A. Janke, U. Arnason
openaire +1 more source

