Results 51 to 60 of about 88,808 (113)

Doxastic Voluntarism, Epistemic Deontology and Belief-contravening Commitments [PDF]

open access: yes, 2013
Defenders of doxastic voluntarism accept that we can voluntarily commit ourselves to propositions, including belief-contravening propositions. Thus, defenders of doxastic voluntarism allow that we can choose to believe propositions that are negatively ...
Shaffer, Michael J.
core  

Preface to this special issue on free will and epistemology [PDF]

open access: yes, 2019
This is a preface to the special edition of the European Journal of Analytic Philosophy on my 2018 monograph and the topics from that monograph: Free Will and Epistemology.
Lockie, Robert
core  

Special issue of EuJAP: Free Will and Epistemology [PDF]

open access: yes, 2019
Preface to the Special Issue on Free Will and Epistemology written by Robert ...
András Szigeti   +3 more
core   +1 more source

Decolonizing Bioethics in Africa. [PDF]

open access: yesBEOnline, 2016
Fayemi AK, Macaulay-Adeyelure OC.
europepmc   +1 more source

The value of truth: introduction to the topical collection

open access: yesSynthese, 2020
Luca Moretti   +2 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Deontological evidentialism, wide-scope, and privileged values [PDF]

open access: yes, 2017
Deontological evidentialism is the claim that we ought to form and maintain our beliefs in accordance with our evidence. In this paper, I criticize two arguments in its defense. I begin by discussing Berit Broogard’s use of the distinction between narrow-
Oliveira, Luis
core  

Doxastic Responsibility and the Challenge of Doxastic Voluntarism. Insights from Cases of Self-Deception [PDF]

open access: yes
In the article, I present the debate on doxastic voluntarism and its relation to doxastic responsibility. I outline the discussion in the literature, focusing on Alston’s argument against doxastic responsibility, and then present my ...
Odoj, Ewa
core  

Response to Elqayam, Nottelmann, Peels and Vahid on my paper 'Perspectivism, deontologism and epistemic poverty'

open access: yes, 2016
I here respond to four SERRC commentators on my paper ‘Perspectivism, Deontologism and Epistemic Poverty’: Shira Elqayam, Nikolaj Nottelmann, Rik Peels and Hamid Vahid. I maintain that all accounts of epistemic justification must be constrained by two limit positions which have to be avoided.
openaire  

Ethics and responsibility in biohybrid robotics research. [PDF]

open access: yesProc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Mestre R   +4 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy