Results 31 to 40 of about 91,979 (245)
Riggs on strong justification [PDF]
, 1998 In 'The Weakness of Strong Justification' Wayne Riggs claims that the requirement that justified beliefs be truth conducive (likely to be true) is not always compatible with the requirement that they be epistemically responsible (arrived at in an ...
Bonjour L. +3 more
core +1 more source
Deliberative Indispensability and Epistemic Justification [PDF]
, 2015 Many of us care about the existence of ethical facts because such facts appear crucial to making sense of our practical lives. On one tempting line of thought, this idea does more than raise the metaethical stakes: it can also play a central role in ...
McPherson, Tristram
core +1 more source
Experience and Epistemic Structure: Can Cognitive Penetration Result in Epistemic Downgrade? [PDF]
, 2020 Reflection on the possibility of cases in which experience is cognitively penetrated has suggested to many that an experience's etiology can reduce its capacity to provide prima facie justification for believing its content below a baseline.
Chudnoff, Elijah
core +1 more source
A noção deontológica de justificação epistêmica [PDF]
Princípios, 2007 In this assay we present an introduction to the deontological conception of epistemic justification. We show that the deontological conception of epistemic justification appears of a parallel traced between ethics and epistemology by means of the use of ...
Felipe de Matos Muller
doaj
MEMORY COMPATIBILISM: PRESERVING AND GENERATING POSITIVE EPISTEMIC STATUS [PDF]
Kriterion, 2019 The contemporary epistemological debate regarding the epistemic role of memory is dominated by the dispute between two different views: memory preservationism and memory generativism. While the former holds that memory only preserves the epistemic status
Tiegue Vieira Rodrigues
doaj +1 more source
Does Suppositional Reasoning Solve the Bootstrapping Problem? [PDF]
, 2015 In a 2002 article Stewart Cohen advances the “bootstrapping problem” for what he calls “basic justification theories,” and in a 2010 followup he offers a solution to the problem, exploiting the idea that suppositional reasoning may be used with ...
Van Cleve, James
core +1 more source
Trading One Kind of Dogmatism for Another: Comments on Williams Criticism of Aggripan Scepticism
Tópicos, 2013 M. Williams’ analysis (1999, 2001 and 2004b) of the Prior Grounding Conception (PGC) of epistemic justification — a conception allegedly behind the Agrippan trilemma — is reviewed and it is contrasted with the Default Challenge Conception of ...
Armando Cíntora, Jorge Ornelas
doaj +1 more source
Pragmatics in Epistemology: Analyzing Pragmatic Encroachment vs. Epistemic Purism [PDF]
حکمت و فلسفه, 2019 Epistemological orthodoxy is a purist one in the sense that it permits only truth-related factors to be relevant to whether or not true belief amounts to knowledge. Contrary to this orthodoxy, ‘Pragmatic Encroachment’ argues that embracing fallibilism we
zeinab salari, Ebrahim Azadegan
doaj +1 more source
Epistemic justification puzzle
, 2011 The thesis explores the semantics of epistemic justification discourse, a very important part of overall epistemic discourse. It embarks from a critical examination of referentialist theories to arrive at a certain nonreferential, expressivist approach to the semantics of epistemic justification discourse. That is, it criticizes the main referentialist
Christos Kyriacou
openalex +3 more sources
Undaunted Explanationism [PDF]
, 2017 Explanationism is a plausible view of epistemic justification according to which justification is a matter of explanatory considerations. Despite its plausibility, explanationism is not without its critics. In a recent issue of this journal T.
McCain, Kevin
core +1 more source