Results 11 to 20 of about 402,354 (276)
Consensual Decision-Making Among Epistemic Peers [PDF]
Episteme, 2009 ABSTRACTThis paper focuses on the question of how to resolve disagreement and uses the Lehrer-Wagner model as a formal tool for investigating consensual decision-making. The main result consists in a general definition of when agents treat each other as epistemic peers (Kelly 2005; Elga 2007), and a theorem vindicating the “equal weight view” to ...
Hartmann, Stephan +2 more
openaire +6 more sources
Dealing With Disagreement: Distinguishing Two Types of Epistemic Peers [PDF]
Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science, 2010 Epistemologists have recently debated how we should respond to apparent cases of rational disagreement. Is it possible for two people to disagree and have both people still be rational? Those involved in this debate make use of the idea of epistemic peers. Two people are epistemic peers if they share the same knowledge of a given topic and have similar
Wald, Benjamin Elliott
core +5 more sources
Epistemic pluralism, epistemic relativism and ‘hinge’ epistemology [PDF]
, 2017 According to Paul Boghossian (2006, 73) a core tenet of epistemic relativism is what he calls epistemic pluralism, according to which (i) ‘there are many fundamentally different, genuinely alternative epistemic systems’, but (ii) ‘no facts by virtue of ...
Carter, J. Adam
core +8 more sources
Against the Equal Weight View in the Epistemology of Disagreement [PDF]
حکمت و فلسفه, 2018 In this paper I propose an argument against the conciliatory view in peer disagreement. One of the most important grounds for conciliatory views is the assumption that the epistemic situation in peer disagreement between two peers is symmetri cal ...
امید کریم زاده
doaj +1 more source
Epistemic Norms, A Priority, and Self-Knowledge [PDF]
, 2011 This thesis is primarily focussed on developing a novel characterisation of the distinction between a priori and a posteriori justification. My working hypothesis is that we can make a surprising amount of progress in this field by paying attention to ...
Flockemann, Richard
core +6 more sources
Combining Intra- and Interindividual Approaches in Epistemic Beliefs Research
Frontiers in Psychology, 2020 We combined inter- and intraindividual approaches to investigate university students’ biology- and psychology-specific specific epistemic beliefs (beliefs about the nature and structure of knowledge).
Tom Rosman, Eva Seifried, Samuel Merk
doaj +1 more source
Big Data & Society, 2023 Many scientists share preprints on social media platforms to gain attention from academic peers, policy-makers, and journalists. In this study we shed light on an unintended but highly consequential effect of sharing preprints: Their contribution to ...
Mareike Bauer +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Epistemic Peer Disagreement [PDF]
, 2019 This essay presents and critically assesses some of the main positions in the peer disagreement debates and offers a new position based on a pluralistic understanding of epistemic rationality according to which questions concerning internal rationality should be kept distinct from questions concerning external rationality.
Ferrari Filippo, Pedersen N. J. L. L.
openaire +1 more source
Desacuerdos entre Pares Epistémicos. El Número Importa.
Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology, 2016 The debate over the epistemology of desagreement is full of disagreements. However, both conciliationists and steadfasts agree on the following thesis: once I have taken into account the disagreement with an epistemic peer P1, that is, once I have ...
Nicolás Francisco Lo Guercio
doaj +1 more source
Conciliationist Approach to the Challenge of Religious Disagreement [PDF]
پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین, 2018 Conciliationists believe that after the emergence of disagreement between epistemic peers, one cannot reasonably be committed to her previous belief or her degree of confidence in that.
Ghazaleh Hojjati
doaj +1 more source