Results 101 to 110 of about 10,503 (121)

Comparative Evaluation of Etest, EUCAST, and CLSI Methods for Amphotericin B, Voriconazole, and Posaconazole against Clinically Relevant Fusarium Species.

open access: yesAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2017
Item does not contain fulltextWe compared EUCAST and CLSI methods versus Etest for antifungal susceptibility testing of 20 clinically relevant Fusarium species against amphotericin B, posaconazole, and voriconazole.
Renaud Piarroux   +2 more
exaly   +4 more sources

Comparison of Etest, Vitek and agar dilution for susceptibility testing of colistin [PDF]

open access: yesClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2007
In total, 172 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were tested for susceptibility to colistin by agar dilution, Etest and the Vitek 2 system. Isolates with a colistin MIC ≤2 mg/L were
T Y Tan
exaly   +2 more sources

Fosfomycin Etest for Enterobacteriaceae: Interobserver and interlaboratory agreement [PDF]

open access: yesInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2018
Objectives: The increasing use of fosfomycin requires reliable susceptibility testing in clinical practice. The reference standard, agar dilution (AD), is rarely used in routine settings.
John W.A. Rossen   +2 more
exaly   +4 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Colistin susceptibility testing by Etest and disk diffusion methods

International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2008
Irene Galani   +2 more
exaly  

Comparison of the Etest and agar dilution for in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter.

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2002
Beilei Ge   +2 more
exaly  

Comparison of three test media for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bifidobacteria using the Etest method

International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2006
Jaana Matto, M -L Suihko
exaly  

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy