Results 41 to 50 of about 161 (152)
Complementary apologetics: An attempt for the integration of apologetic schools
Within Christian apologetics several schools of thought exist. This article is firstly an attempt to come to a classification of these different schools. Next, the agreements and disagreements between these schools are investigated.
Willem van Vlastuin
doaj +1 more source
Trust, risk, and mere vulnerability
Abstract Many philosophers of trust endorse the idea that trust is inherently risky. This raises the question of how exactly we ought to understand the relevant notion of risk. Should we understand it in objectivist or evidentialist terms? I argue that neither of these two ways of unpacking things holds up in light of number of clear examples of trust ...
Matthew Jope
wiley +1 more source
Creationism is not only a pseudoscience present in Brazil but also a political problem. In reality, creationism as a pseudoscience and as a political issue are entangled in this Latin American country.
Henrique Mata de Vasconcelos
doaj +1 more source
Putting Racism Back in the Head
ABSTRACT Personal racism used to be widely considered a kind of cognitive defect, with racists being people with biased, irrational racial attitudes. This kind of epistemic “racism‐in‐the‐head” view has fallen largely out of favor in recent decades.
Jordan Scott
wiley +1 more source
Interpersonal Reasoning: A Philosophical Psychology of Testimonial Trust
Abstract Anscombe famously said, “It is an insult and it may be an injury not to be believed.” But what is it to believe someone? My aim is to show that understanding what it is to believe someone requires a conception of a distinctive kind of interpersonal reasoning.
Berislav Marušić
wiley +1 more source
Epistemic duties and failure to understand one’s evidence
The paper defends the thesis that our epistemic duty is the duty to proportion our beliefs to the evidence we possess. An inclusive view of evidenced possessed is put forward on the grounds that it makes sense of our intuitions about when it is right to ...
Scott Stapleford
doaj
Reasons, attenuators, and virtue: A novel account of pragmatic encroachment
Abstract In this paper, I explicate pragmatic encroachment by appealing to pragmatic considerations attenuating, or weakening, epistemic reasons to believe. I call this the ‘Attenuators View’. I will show that this proposal is better than spelling out pragmatic encroachment in terms of reasons against believing – what I call the ‘Reasons View’.
Eva Schmidt
wiley +1 more source
Locke and Leibniz on epistemic autonomy
Abstract This article argues that Locke's views about the nature of knowledge, on the one hand, and about the proper regulation of probable judgment, on the other hand, give rise to a radical form of individual epistemic autonomy. Three theses are defended: First, Locke's conception of the nature of knowledge implies that the knowledge of other ...
Jennifer Smalligan Marušić
wiley +1 more source
Negatif Ateizm Ateizmi Gerekçelendirebilir mi?
Ateizmin gerekçelendirilmesi gereken bir tutum olup olmadığı ve hangi koşulların sağlanması durumunda rasyonel bir gerekçelendirmeden bahsedilebileceği sorunu, en az teizmin gerekçelendirilmesi sorunu kadar önemlidir.
Fatma Nur Ağca
doaj +1 more source
What's Wrong with Wishful Thinking? “Manifesting” as an Epistemic Vice
Abstract The popular trend of manifesting involves supposedly making something happen by imagining it and consciously thinking it will happen in order to will it into existence. In this paper Laura D'Olimpio explains why manifesting is a form of wishful thinking and argues that it is an epistemic vice. She describes how such wishful thinking generally,
Laura D'Olimpio
wiley +1 more source

