Results 41 to 50 of about 161 (152)

Complementary apologetics: An attempt for the integration of apologetic schools

open access: yesIn die Skriflig, 2016
Within Christian apologetics several schools of thought exist. This article is firstly an attempt to come to a classification of these different schools. Next, the agreements and disagreements between these schools are investigated.
Willem van Vlastuin
doaj   +1 more source

Trust, risk, and mere vulnerability

open access: yesPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research, Volume 111, Issue 2, Page 407-422, September 2025.
Abstract Many philosophers of trust endorse the idea that trust is inherently risky. This raises the question of how exactly we ought to understand the relevant notion of risk. Should we understand it in objectivist or evidentialist terms? I argue that neither of these two ways of unpacking things holds up in light of number of clear examples of trust ...
Matthew Jope
wiley   +1 more source

Evangelicals and the Creationist God: An Examination of Brazilian Creationism as an Educational and Political Problem

open access: yesReligions
Creationism is not only a pseudoscience present in Brazil but also a political problem. In reality, creationism as a pseudoscience and as a political issue are entangled in this Latin American country.
Henrique Mata de Vasconcelos
doaj   +1 more source

Putting Racism Back in the Head

open access: yesPhilosophy &Public Affairs, Volume 53, Issue 3, Page 218-228, Summer 2025.
ABSTRACT Personal racism used to be widely considered a kind of cognitive defect, with racists being people with biased, irrational racial attitudes. This kind of epistemic “racism‐in‐the‐head” view has fallen largely out of favor in recent decades.
Jordan Scott
wiley   +1 more source

Interpersonal Reasoning: A Philosophical Psychology of Testimonial Trust

open access: yesEuropean Journal of Philosophy, Volume 33, Issue 2, Page 531-549, June 2025.
Abstract Anscombe famously said, “It is an insult and it may be an injury not to be believed.” But what is it to believe someone? My aim is to show that understanding what it is to believe someone requires a conception of a distinctive kind of interpersonal reasoning.
Berislav Marušić
wiley   +1 more source

Epistemic duties and failure to understand one’s evidence

open access: yesPrincipia: An International Journal of Epistemology, 2012
The paper defends the thesis that our epistemic duty is the duty to proportion our beliefs to the evidence we possess. An inclusive view of evidenced possessed is put forward on the grounds that it makes sense of our intuitions about when it is right to ...
Scott Stapleford
doaj  

Reasons, attenuators, and virtue: A novel account of pragmatic encroachment

open access: yesAnalytic Philosophy, Volume 66, Issue 2, Page 159-180, June 2025.
Abstract In this paper, I explicate pragmatic encroachment by appealing to pragmatic considerations attenuating, or weakening, epistemic reasons to believe. I call this the ‘Attenuators View’. I will show that this proposal is better than spelling out pragmatic encroachment in terms of reasons against believing – what I call the ‘Reasons View’.
Eva Schmidt
wiley   +1 more source

Locke and Leibniz on epistemic autonomy

open access: yesThe Southern Journal of Philosophy, Volume 63, Issue 2, Page 143-156, June 2025.
Abstract This article argues that Locke's views about the nature of knowledge, on the one hand, and about the proper regulation of probable judgment, on the other hand, give rise to a radical form of individual epistemic autonomy. Three theses are defended: First, Locke's conception of the nature of knowledge implies that the knowledge of other ...
Jennifer Smalligan Marušić
wiley   +1 more source

Negatif Ateizm Ateizmi Gerekçelendirebilir mi?

open access: yesİlahiyat Tetkikleri Dergisi
Ateizmin gerekçelendirilmesi gereken bir tutum olup olmadığı ve hangi koşulların sağlanması durumunda rasyonel bir gerekçelendirmeden bahsedilebileceği sorunu, en az teizmin gerekçelendirilmesi sorunu kadar önemlidir.
Fatma Nur Ağca
doaj   +1 more source

What's Wrong with Wishful Thinking? “Manifesting” as an Epistemic Vice

open access: yesEducational Theory, Volume 75, Issue 2, Page 260-275, April 2025.
Abstract The popular trend of manifesting involves supposedly making something happen by imagining it and consciously thinking it will happen in order to will it into existence. In this paper Laura D'Olimpio explains why manifesting is a form of wishful thinking and argues that it is an epistemic vice. She describes how such wishful thinking generally,
Laura D'Olimpio
wiley   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy