Detecting jingle and jangle fallacies by identifying consistencies and variabilities in study specifications – a call for research [PDF]
Frontiers in PsychologyOver the past few years, more attention has been paid to jingle and jangle fallacies in psychological science. Jingle fallacies arise when two or more distinct psychological phenomena are erroneously labeled with the same term, while jangle fallacies ...
Barbara Hanfstingl +4 more
doaj +3 more sources
Reasoning Under Uncertainty: The Role of Two Informal Fallacies in an Emerging Scientific Inquiry [PDF]
Informal Logic, 2002 lt is now commonplace in fallacy inquiry for many of the traditional informal fallacies to be viewed as reasonable or nonfallacious modes of argument.
Louise Cummings
doaj +3 more sources
Measuring university students’ ability to recognize argument structures and fallacies [PDF]
Frontiers in Psychology, 2023 TheoryArgumentation is crucial for all academic disciplines. Nevertheless, a lack of argumentation skills among students is evident. Two core aspects of argumentation are the recognition of argument structures (e.g., backing up claims with premises ...
Yvonne Berkle +7 more
doaj +2 more sources
A technocognitive approach to detecting fallacies in climate misinformation [PDF]
Scientific ReportsMisinformation about climate change is a complex societal issue that requires holistic, interdisciplinary solutions at the intersection between technology and psychology.
Francisco Zanartu +3 more
doaj +2 more sources
At the pillar of the proverbial Golden Calf: Sacrificing the Need for ‘Responsible Knowing’ on the Altar of a Compliance-Based Ethic [PDF]
Journal of Human Services: Training, Research, and Practice, 2017 Evidence-based practice (EBP) has been promoted and adopted broadly and has led to advances in health and human services. Notwithstanding the underlying rationale of EBP philosophy to diversify the current body of information concerning evidence-based ...
Izaak L. Williams CSAC
doaj +2 more sources
Cognitive miserliness in argument literacy? Effects of intuitive and analytic thinking on recognizing fallacies [PDF]
Judgment and Decision Making, 2022 Fallacies are a particular type of informal argument that are psychologically compelling and often used for rhetorical purposes. Fallacies are unreasonable because the reasons they provide for their claims are irrelevant or insufficient.
Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen +1 more
doaj +2 more sources
Informal logic and fallacies in the field of history
Turkish History Education Journal, 2021 It is not possible to talk about a research field, a study discipline in which there is no logic, correct thinking, argumentation, deduction, and reasoning.
Fatma Gültekin
doaj +1 more source
The gambler's fallacy fallacy (fallacy)
Journal of Risk Research, 2016 The gambler's fallacy is the irrational belief that prior outcomes in a series of events affect the probability of a future outcome, even though the events in question are independent and identically distributed. In this paper, we argue that in the standard account of the gambler's fallacy, the gambler's fallacy fallacy can arise: The irrational belief
Kristiansen, Silje, Kovic, Marko
openaire +4 more sources
Quantifying Aristotle’s Fallacies
Mathematics, 2020 Fallacies are logically false statements which are often considered to be true. In the “Sophistical Refutations”, the last of his six works on Logic, Aristotle identified the first thirteen of today’s many known fallacies and divided them into linguistic
Evangelos Athanassopoulos +1 more
doaj +1 more source
ON WIRMAN’S ALLEGATION OF FALLACIES OF HARUN NASUTION THEOLOGICAL LOGIC
Journal of Indonesian Islam, 2023 Theology has been employing logic in order to justify faith with reasons not to mention bridging a gap between some different theological schools of thoughts. This article aims to examine Wirman’s claim of fallacies against Nasution’s theological thought.
Qusthan A. H. Firdaus
doaj +1 more source