Results 191 to 200 of about 1,829 (211)
Credibility revolution: pursuing a balanced and sustainable approach, without dogmas, without magic elixirs. [PDF]
Vallesi A.
europepmc +1 more source
Homo sapiens reached the higher latitudes of Europe by 45,000 years ago. [PDF]
Mylopotamitaki D +32 more
europepmc +1 more source
HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known [PDF]
This article considers a practice in scientific communication termed HARKing (Hypothesizing After the Results are Known). HARKing is defined as presenting a post hoc hypothesis (i.e., one based on or informed by one's results) in one's research report as
Norbert Kerr
exaly +2 more sources
When Does HARKing Hurt? Identifying When Different Types of Undisclosed Post Hoc Hypothesizing Harm Scientific Progress [PDF]
Hypothesizing after the results are known, or HARKing, occurs when researchers check their research results and then add or remove hypotheses on the basis of those results without acknowledging this process in their research report (Kerr, 1998).
Mark Rubin
exaly +4 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
HARKing: How Badly Can Cherry-Picking and Question Trolling Produce Bias in Published Results?
Journal of Business and Psychology, 2017Herman Aguinis, Kevin Murphy
exaly
HARKing's Threat to Organizational Research: Evidence From Primary and Meta‐Analytic Sources
Personnel Psychology, 2016James Field +2 more
exaly

