Results 11 to 20 of about 2,060,229 (274)

Erratum to: “SANCscope—v.1.00” [Comput. Phys. Commun. 174 (2006) 481–517, hep-ph/0411186] [PDF]

Computer Physics Communications, 2007
W. von Schlippe, A. Andonov, Lidia Kalinovskaya, P. Christova, G. Nanava, Andrej Arbuzov, S. Bondarenko, D. Y. Bardin   +7 more
semanticscholar   +3 more sources

Reply to hep-ph/0605114

, 2006
The claim of preprint hep-ph/0605114 that there is "no neutrino spin light because of photon dispersion in medium" is wrong.
Grigoriev, Alexander, Lobanov, Andrey, Studenikin, Alexander, Ternov, Alexei   +3 more
  +6 more sources

A few final comments to arXiv:1210.7548[hep-ph]

, 2012
A few final comments on arXiv:1210.7548 are given to confute incorrect arguments claimed there.
Bernabei, R., Belli, P., Cappella, F., Caracciolo, V., Cerulli, R., Dai, C. J., d'Angelo, A., Di Marco, A., He, H. L., Incicchitti, A., Ma, X. H., Montecchia, F., Sheng, X. D., Wang, R. G., Ye, Z. P.   +14 more
openaire   +4 more sources

Replay to hep-ph/0606266

, 2006
The \to amplitude is found from the e+e-\to amplitude suggested in Ref. hep-ph/0606266. It is shown that the found amplitude differs essentially from that studied in Refs. hep-ph/0606266 and [3]. It is noticed that the suggestion of the author of Ref. hep-ph/0606266 about the phase of the \to amplitude is misleading.
Николай Николаевич Ачасов
  +6 more sources

REPLY TO HEP-PH/0211241 "On the extra factor of two in the phase of neutrino oscillations"

, 2003
Arguments continue to appear in the literature concerning the validity of the standard oscillation formula. We point out some misunderstandings and try to explain in simple terms our viewpoint.
De Leo, S., Nishi, C. C., Rotelli, P.
openaire   +4 more sources

Comments on "On the Dirac-Majorana neutrinos distinction in four-body decays" (arXiv:2305.14140 [hep-ph], Phys. Rev. D 109, no.3, 033005 (2024))

, 2023
In arXiv:2305.14140 [hep-ph] the authors analyze the radiative leptonic decay $\ell^- \to ν_\ell \, \overlineν_{\ell'} \, \ell^{\prime -} \, γ$ to distinguish between Dirac and Majorana nature of neutrinos. They utilize the back-to-back kinematics for this purpose, a special kinematic configuration which we first proposed in our paper arXiv:2106.11785 [
Kim, C. S., Murthy, M. V. N., Sahoo, Dibyakrupa   +2 more
openaire   +4 more sources

Comment on papers hep-ph/0603166, hep-ph/0606291, hep-ph/0606310 by S.S. Afonin

, 2006
This is Comment on recent 3 papers by S.S ...
A. E. Inopin
openaire   +4 more sources

Comment to the review by L. Glozman, hep-ph/0701081

, 2007
This is a Comment to the recent review by L.
A. E. Inopin
openaire   +4 more sources

Comment on hep-ph/0404212 by D. Diakonov, V. Petrov, and M. Polyakov

, 2004
2 pages, figure available at URL provided in ...
R. L. Jaffe
openaire   +4 more sources

Comments on the "Reply" presented in hep-ph/0701058v1

, 2007
Comments are presented on the analyses of $ $/$K $ scattering and production processes in relation with the combined fit and Adler zero concerning the hep-ph/0701058v1.
K. Takamatsu
openaire   +4 more sources