Results 31 to 40 of about 153 (145)
In the Beatific Vision, both Freedom and Necessity
According to Aquinas, the souls in heaven (hereafter, the blessed) are both necessitated (i.e., determined) and free in their choice to love God. But if Aquinas is right, it may seem that we cannot give an incompatibilist account of the freedom of the ...
Justin Noia
doaj +1 more source
Causal counterfactuals without miracles or backtracking
Abstract If the laws are deterministic, then standard theories of counterfactuals are forced to reject at least one of the following conditionals: 1) had you chosen differently, there would not have been a violation of the laws of nature; and 2) had you chosen differently, the initial conditions of the universe would not have been different.
J. Dmitri Gallow
wiley +1 more source
Freedom or control of how we act is often and very naturally understood as a kind of power—a power to determine for ourselves how we act. Is freedom conceived as such a power possible, and what kind of power must it be?
Thomas Pink
doaj +1 more source
Explaining and Evaluating Types of Liberal Incompatibilism in Solving the Conflict between Human Free Will and the Determined World [PDF]
Liberal incompatibilism considers the causal determinism governing all events of the world (including free actions) as a serious obstacle to human freedom.Thus, they seek a way of protecting human freedom with one of these three different approaches: 1 ...
Zeynab Abolghasemi Dehaghani +1 more
doaj +1 more source
Conditional analyses of options for action: A partial defence
Abstract The idea of multiple options for action in a specific situation is essential for choice and deliberation. But what exactly is an option for action? A simple and natural approach to this question is via conditional analyses. While conditional analyses of dispositions and abilities face well‐known objections and are widely considered untenable ...
Jacob Rosenthal
wiley +1 more source
Foreknowledge requires determinism
Abstract There is a longstanding argument that purports to show that divine foreknowledge is inconsistent with human freedom to do otherwise. Proponents of this argument, however, have for some time been met with the following reply: the argument posits what would have to be a mysterious non‐causal constraint on freedom.
Patrick Todd
wiley +1 more source
From modal fallacies to a new argument for fatalism
Do incompatibilist arguments, like some fatalist arguments, rest on modal fallacies? If Westphal (2012) is right, then one popular argument for incompatibilism van Inwagen’s “First Formal Argument” does rest on a modal fallacy. Similarly, Warfield (2000)
PEDRO MERLUSSI
doaj +1 more source
In this paper free volitions are construed as a subclass of reflective judgements in the Kantian meaning, i.e. judgements not involving any fixed concepts but displaying a concept-like form.
Marcin Poręba
doaj +1 more source
Free will and self expression: A compatibilist garden of forking paths
Philosophical Issues, Volume 33, Issue 1, Page 299-313, October 2023.
Robyn Repko Waller
wiley +1 more source
Can Soft‐Line Compatibilism Handle Eternally Recurrent Manipulation?
ABSTRACT A key challenge to compatibilism comes from manipulation arguments. These argue that agents whose actions are manipulated are not morally responsible and that manipulation is not relevantly different from determinism. One common response from compatibilists is to claim that there is a relevant difference between manipulation and ordinary ...
James Andow
wiley +1 more source

