Results 11 to 20 of about 11,106,432 (291)
Remarks on the outer-independent double Italian domination number [PDF]
Let \(G\) be a graph with vertex set \(V(G)\). If \(u\in V(G)\), then \(N[u]\) is the closed neighborhood of \(u\). An outer-independent double Italian dominating function (OIDIDF) on a graph \(G\) is a function \(f:V(G)\longrightarrow \{0,1,2,3\}\) such
Lutz Volkmann
doaj +3 more sources
On the Total Outer k-Independent Domination Number of Graphs
A set of vertices of a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to at least one vertex in such a set. We say that a total dominating set D is a total outer k-independent dominating set of G if the maximum degree of the subgraph ...
Abel Cabrera-Martínez +3 more
doaj +2 more sources
On domination and independent domination numbers of a graph [PDF]
AbstractFor a graph G, the definitions of domination number, denoted γ(G), and independent domination number, denoted i(G), are given, and the following results are obtained:Theorem. If G does not have an induced subgraph isomorphic to K1,3, then γ(G) = i(G).Corollary 1. For any graph G, γ(L(G))=i(L(G)), where L(G) is the line graph of G. (This extends
Robert B. Allan, Renu C. Laskar
openaire +2 more sources
The independent domination number of a random graph [PDF]
We prove a two-point concentration for the independent domination number of the random graph Gn,p provided p 2 ln(n) 64ln((lnn)=p). occurs asymptotically almost surely (a.a.s.) if P(Gn;p has property A) ! 1 as n ! 1 . See Bollobas (2) for notation and terminology. Weber (7) showed if p = 1=2 then a.a.s. (Gn;p) is either blog2 n − log2(log2 nlnn)c + 1
Lane H. Clark, Darin Johnson
openaire +2 more sources
Extremal connected graphs for independent domination number [PDF]
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Brigham, Robert C. +2 more
core +5 more sources
On independent domination number of regular graphs [PDF]
A subset \(S\) of the vertex set of a graph \(G\) is called independent, if no two of its vertices are adjacent in \(G\). An independent set in \(G\) is maximal, if it is not a proper subset of another independent set of \(G\). The minimum number of vertices of a maximal independent set is the independent domination number \(i(G)\) of \(G\).
Peter Che Bor Lam +2 more
openaire +4 more sources
Independent Restrained k - Rainbow Dominating Function
Let G be a graph and let f be a function that assigns to each vertex a set of colors chosen from the set {1, 2…, k} that is f: V(G) P [1,2,…,k]. If for each vertex v V(G) such that f(v) = .we have then f is called the k – Rainbow Dominating Function (
M Esakki Dharani, A Nagarajan, K Palani
doaj +1 more source
Isolate and independent domination number of some classes of graphs
In this paper we compute isolate domination number and independent domination number of some well known classes of graphs. Also a counter example is provided, which disprove the result on independent domination for Euler Totient Cayley graph proved by ...
Shilpa T. Bhangale, Madhukar M. Pawar
doaj +2 more sources
On trees with equal Roman domination and outer-independent Roman domination number [PDF]
A Roman dominating function (RDF) on a graph $G$ is a function $f : V (G) \to \{0, 1, 2\}$ satisfying the condition that every vertex $u$ for which $f(u) = 0$ is adjacent to at least one vertex $v$ for which $f(v) = 2$.
S. Nazari-Moghaddam, S.M. Sheikholeslami
doaj +1 more source
Independent Transversal Total Domination Versus Total Domination in Trees
A subset of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex in G is adjacent to at least one vertex in this subset. The total domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of any total dominating set in G and is denoted by γt(G).
Martínez Abel Cabrera +2 more
doaj +1 more source

