Results 201 to 210 of about 31,158 (240)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Continuous intravenous regional anesthesia

The Journal of Hand Surgery, 1992
This study evaluates the effectiveness of continuous intravenous regional anesthesia for prolonged operations on the upper extremity. The factors evaluated include patient's sex and age, number of procedures performed, tourniquet on and off times, anesthetic doses, adjunctive drugs used, technical complications, and side effects. Seventy-two procedures
L T, Glickman   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Regional Anesthesia with Intravenous Lidocaine

JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1963
The ability to induce regional total anesthesia with a safe intravenous agent would represent an advance in the management of many problems concerning the extremities. Intravenous anesthesia with local agents has been recognized since the original work of Bier1in 1908, but in spite of occasional reports in the literature it has not received general ...
H M, BELL, E M, SLATER, W H, HARRIS
openaire   +2 more sources

Regional Intravenous Anesthesia

JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1965
To the Editor:— I believe that your blanket statement in the last sentence, based on the limited bibliography referred to in the article, is invalid. We are continuing to use this form of anesthesia in selected cases and have found nothing, to date, which would indicate any of our earlier published assumptions are wrong (J Bone Joint Surg [Amer]46:811-
  +5 more sources

Intravenous Regional Anesthesia with Meperidine

Anesthesia & Analgesia, 1995
Forty-five ASA physical status I volunteers, divided in three groups of 15 each, received intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) of the upper limb with 40 mL meperidine 0.25%, lidocaine 0.5%, or 0.9% sodium chloride (isolated ischemia) by random allocation.
I, Acalovschi, T, Cristea
openaire   +2 more sources

Ketamine for Intravenous Regional Anesthesia

Anesthesia & Analgesia, 1989
We studied ketamine intravenous regional anesthesia of the upper extremity in volunteers using concentrations of 0.5%, 0.3%, and 0.2%. Ketamine 0.5 and 0.3% produced adequate intravenous regional anesthesia. Anesthesia was inadequate when a 0.2% concentration was used. However, although the 0.3% concentration provides complete sympathetic, sensory, and
Z, Durrani   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Intraosseous Regional Anesthesia as an Alternative to Intravenous Regional Anesthesia

The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1995
A series of 109 orthopedic operations was performed under intraosseous regional anesthesia on the upper and lower limbs. Anesthesia was satisfactory in 106 of the cases; in the other three, inadequate anesthesia was caused by faulty technique. The spread of lidocaine into the bone and venous network was demonstrated by radiography, and the blood levels
M, Waisman   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Intravenous Regional Anesthesia in Hand Surgery

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1964
We have found intravenous regional anesthesia, by the method of expressing the blood, applying a temporary tourniquet, injecting the lidocaine, then placing the second tourniquet on an anesthetized portion of the arm and removing the first tourniquet, to be a very simple and effective way to achieve anesthesia in operations on the hand.
J P, ADAMS, E J, DEALY, P I, KENMORE
openaire   +2 more sources

Intravenous Regional Anesthesia

1988
Intravenous regional anesthesia was first described by Bier in 1908. The technique fell into disuse until 1963, when Holmes revived the technique by substituting lidocaine for procaine (see Sect. V. D, “Choice and Dosage of Agents”).
Prithvi Raj   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Intravenous regional anesthesia

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 1983
P S, Schwartz, A, Newman, A L, Green
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy