Results 1 to 10 of about 492,305 (300)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Nursing Science Quarterly, 2014
The purpose of this column is to consider if research using only an interview should be evaluated by an institutional review board (IRB) or if it may be considered exempt. A review of atrocities committed by researchers both in the biomedical and psychosocial domains will be considered as a backdrop to the discussion.
Kristine L, Florczak, Nancy M, Lockie
openaire +2 more sources
The purpose of this column is to consider if research using only an interview should be evaluated by an institutional review board (IRB) or if it may be considered exempt. A review of atrocities committed by researchers both in the biomedical and psychosocial domains will be considered as a backdrop to the discussion.
Kristine L, Florczak, Nancy M, Lockie
openaire +2 more sources
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 2009
The need to ensure the maximal safety of patients participating in clinical research has led to a number of regulations and oversight measures. None of these has had a more profound effect on the way such research is carried out in the United States than the establishment of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) system.
openaire +2 more sources
The need to ensure the maximal safety of patients participating in clinical research has led to a number of regulations and oversight measures. None of these has had a more profound effect on the way such research is carried out in the United States than the establishment of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) system.
openaire +2 more sources
New England Journal of Medicine, 1979
To the Editor: In view of the ongoing debate regarding the composition of Institutional Review Boards (IRB's) and the relation of their structure to their task of providing protection for human research subjects,1 it may be instructive to consider some principles of group dynamics, particularly the role of power within the group setting.
openaire +2 more sources
To the Editor: In view of the ongoing debate regarding the composition of Institutional Review Boards (IRB's) and the relation of their structure to their task of providing protection for human research subjects,1 it may be instructive to consider some principles of group dynamics, particularly the role of power within the group setting.
openaire +2 more sources
To IRB or Not to IRB: That Is the Question!
AORN Journal, 2012Sharon, Chappy, Kathleen B, Gaberson
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2014
Jeffrey A, Cooper, Lindsay, McNair
openaire +2 more sources
Jeffrey A, Cooper, Lindsay, McNair
openaire +2 more sources
Science, 2009
In his response to a letter on his Perspective “ Homo experimentalis evolves” ([1][1]) (31 October 2008, p. [672][2]), J. A. List replies that the economic research he conducted did not require informed consent by the unwitting participants because the study yielded interesting results and did no harm.
openaire +1 more source
In his response to a letter on his Perspective “ Homo experimentalis evolves” ([1][1]) (31 October 2008, p. [672][2]), J. A. List replies that the economic research he conducted did not require informed consent by the unwitting participants because the study yielded interesting results and did no harm.
openaire +1 more source
Reducing the Single IRB Burden: Streamlining Electronic IRB Systems
AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 2021Paul Appelbaum +2 more
exaly
Applied AI with PLC and IRB1200
Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 2022Monika Rybczak, Natalia Popowniak
exaly