Results 251 to 260 of about 902,991 (274)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2008
Justification Logic offers a new approach to a theory of knowledge, belief, and evidence, which possesses the potential to have significant impact on applications. The celebrated account of knowledge as justified true belief , which is attributed to Plato, has long been a focus of epistemic studies (cf. [10,15,18,26,30,32] and many others).
openaire +2 more sources
Justification Logic offers a new approach to a theory of knowledge, belief, and evidence, which possesses the potential to have significant impact on applications. The celebrated account of knowledge as justified true belief , which is attributed to Plato, has long been a focus of epistemic studies (cf. [10,15,18,26,30,32] and many others).
openaire +2 more sources
What Are Justification Logics?
Fundamenta Informaticae, 2019Justification logic began with Sergei Artemov’s work providing an arithmetic semantics for intuitionistic logic. As part of that work, a small number of explicit modal logics were introduced—logics in which there was a structure of terms that kept track of not just what was a necessary truth, but why it was necessary.
openaire +3 more sources
A new framework for justification logic
Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 2015The logic of justification provides an in-depth analysis of the epistemic states of an agent. This paper aims at solving some of the problems to which the common interpretation of the operators of justification logic is subject by providing a framework in which a crucial distinction between potential and explicit justifiers is exploited.
openaire +2 more sources
Introducing Justification into Epistemic Logic
Journal of Logic and Computation, 2005Plato's tripartite definition of knowledge as justified true belief (JTB) is generally regarded as a set of necessary conditions for the possession of knowledge. The true belief components the JTB definition are represented in formal epistemology by modal logic and its possible worlds semantics.
Sergei N. Artëmov, Elena Nogina
openaire +2 more sources
The Logic of Uncertain Justifications
2013In Artemov’s Justification Logic, one can make statements interpreted as “t is evidence for the truth of formula F.” We propose a variant of this logic in which one can say “I have degree r of confidence that t is evidence for the truth of formula F.” After defining both an axiomatic approach and a semantics for this Logic of Uncertain Justifications ...
openaire +2 more sources
Distributed Knowledge Justification Logics
Theory of Computing Systems, 2013zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +3 more sources
The Ontology of Justifications in the Logical Setting
Studia Logica, 2012The author deals with the question of the nature of justifications, within the context of justification logic. He notes that justifications could be interpreted as sets of formulas fulfilling certain conditions and he then characterizes a semantics in which justifications are given such an interpretation.
openaire +3 more sources
Topological Semantics of Justification Logic
2008The Justification Logic is a family of logical systems obtained from epistemic logics by adding new type of formulas t:F which reads as t is a justification for F. The major epistemic modal logic S4 has a well-known Tarski topological interpretation which interprets □F as the interior of F (a topological equivalent of the 'knowable part of F'). In this
Sergei N. Artëmov, Elena Nogina
openaire +2 more sources
Logics of Justification and Logics of Action
Journal of Economic Issues, 2008AbstractThis article attempts to contribute to the debate on institutional logics, logics of action, identities, and the like, as part of the larger debate about both the concept of institutions and the theory of how institutions influence our thought and behavior. It proposes a distinction between logics of justification and logics of action.
openaire +1 more source
The Justification of the Logical Laws Revisited
Synthese, 2006The proof-theoretic analysis of logical semantics undermines the received view of proof theory as being concerned with symbols devoid of meaning, and of model theory as the sole branch of logical theory entitled to access the realm of semantics. The basic tenet of proof-theoretic semantics is that meaning is given by some rules of proofs, in terms of ...
openaire +2 more sources

