Results 251 to 260 of about 8,487 (301)

Temporal accommodation of legal argumentation

open access: yesProceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2011
This paper proposes to integrate an argumentation framework with techniques from Temporal Constraint Satisfaction. Temporal constraints are thus embedded into legal argumentation to account for temporal aspects of legal reasoning. Through the accommodation of temporal constraints, the validity of arguments and of their conclusions is made relative to ...
RIVERET, REGIS   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation

open access: yes, 2018
This handbook addresses legal reasoning and argumentation from a logical, philosophical and legal perspective. The main forms of legal reasoning and argumentation are covered in an exhaustive and critical fashion, and are analysed in connection with more general types (and problems) of reasoning.
Giorgio Bongiovanni   +5 more
openaire   +4 more sources

Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation

open access: yesArgumentation Library, 2017
This book is an updated and revised edition of Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation published in 1999. It discusses new developments that have taken place in the past 15 years in research of legal argumentation, legal justification and legal ...
Eveline T Feteris
exaly   +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Generating legal arguments

Knowledge-Based Systems, 1989
Legal reasoning in the Common Law system has elements of reasoning by analogy, of reasoning from example, and certain characteristics which are unique. A legal expert system must provide a sophisticated level of justification for its advice, for the justification is the system's most important product.
Alan Tyree   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Argumentation in Legal Reasoning

2009
A popular view of what Artificial Intelligence can do for lawyers is that it can do no more than deduce the consequences from a precisely stated set of facts and legal rules. This immediately makes many lawyers sceptical about the usefulness of such systems: this mechanical approach seems to leave out most of what is important in legal reasoning.
Bench Capon T.   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

The uses of Precedent in Legal Argument

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022
Abstract Courts rely on authoritative judicial precedents by deploying different types of argument. They (a) apply the ratio decidendi of previous cases to the case before them, (b) deploy legal analogies, (c) argue a fortiori, (d) argue a simile, (e) infer more general principles, inter alia.
openaire   +1 more source

Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes

Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2009
Legal reasoning typically requires a variety of argumentation schemes to be used together. A legal case may raise issues requiring argument from precedent cases, rules, policy goals, moral principles, jurisprudential doctrine, social values and evidence.
Thomas F. Gordon, Douglas Walton
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy