Results 241 to 250 of about 344,181 (300)
The Relationship Between Judgments of Evil and Punishment Judgments. [PDF]
Wheat R, Goodwin G.
europepmc +1 more source
An Unusual Patchy Alopecia in a 15th Century Altarpiece From Colmar, France
JEADV Clinical Practice, EarlyView.
Nicolas Kluger
wiley +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Annual Review of Psychology, 2021
Research on morality has increased rapidly over the past 10 years. At the center of this research are moral judgments—evaluative judgments that a perceiver makes in response to a moral norm violation. But there is substantial diversity in what has been called moral judgment.
openaire +2 more sources
Research on morality has increased rapidly over the past 10 years. At the center of this research are moral judgments—evaluative judgments that a perceiver makes in response to a moral norm violation. But there is substantial diversity in what has been called moral judgment.
openaire +2 more sources
2023
AbstractShould we trust our gut feelings in ethics and politics? Psychopaths’ brain abnormalities dampen moral feelings like compassion and remorse, which might suggest that emotions are generally good moral guides. However, both typical and atypical brains suggest that rational and emotional capacities are entangled.
openaire +2 more sources
AbstractShould we trust our gut feelings in ethics and politics? Psychopaths’ brain abnormalities dampen moral feelings like compassion and remorse, which might suggest that emotions are generally good moral guides. However, both typical and atypical brains suggest that rational and emotional capacities are entangled.
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1978
Four hundred fifty-four preadolescents from seventh and eighth grades in three subcultures-city, kibbutz, and Israeli Arabs-were compared on the realistic-relativistic dimension of moral judgment. City children were more relativistic in their judgment than both kibbutz children and Israeli Arabs, who were similar in their scores.
Avner Ziv, David Green, Joseph Guttman
openaire +2 more sources
Four hundred fifty-four preadolescents from seventh and eighth grades in three subcultures-city, kibbutz, and Israeli Arabs-were compared on the realistic-relativistic dimension of moral judgment. City children were more relativistic in their judgment than both kibbutz children and Israeli Arabs, who were similar in their scores.
Avner Ziv, David Green, Joseph Guttman
openaire +2 more sources
2014
Legal judgments must be influenced by how people think about good and evil, right and wrong. This chapter reviews some of the history of the psychology of moral judgment, and the methods used to study it. It suggests the use of utilitarianism as a normative model for evaluating judgments, if only because departures from utilitarian judgments could have
+4 more sources
Legal judgments must be influenced by how people think about good and evil, right and wrong. This chapter reviews some of the history of the psychology of moral judgment, and the methods used to study it. It suggests the use of utilitarianism as a normative model for evaluating judgments, if only because departures from utilitarian judgments could have
+4 more sources
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1981
In order to determine when ethical ideology influences judgments of morality, individuals who endorsed an absolutist, exceptionist, subjectivist, or situationist ideology morally evaluated an actor linked, at varying levels of responsibility, to positive or negative outcomes.
openaire +1 more source
In order to determine when ethical ideology influences judgments of morality, individuals who endorsed an absolutist, exceptionist, subjectivist, or situationist ideology morally evaluated an actor linked, at varying levels of responsibility, to positive or negative outcomes.
openaire +1 more source
Deconstructing moral character judgments
Current Opinion in Psychology, 2022People often make judgments of others' moral character - an inferred moral essence that presumably predicts moral behavior. We first define moral character and explore why people make character judgments before outlining three key elements that drive character judgments: behavior (good vs.
Rachel Hartman, Will Blakey, Kurt Gray
openaire +2 more sources

