Results 11 to 20 of about 31,544,274 (308)

Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing [PDF]

open access: yesResearch Integrity and Peer Review, 2020
Background Our aim is to highlight the benefits and limitations of open and non-anonymized peer review. Our argument is based on the literature and on responses to a survey on the reviewing process of alt.chi, a more or less open review track within the ...
Lonni Besançon   +4 more
doaj   +7 more sources

Open Peer Review: Collective Intelligence as a Framework for Theorizing Approaches to Peer Review in the Humanities [PDF]

open access: yesNANO, 2013
This article takes a moderate approach, balancing suggestions for when open peer review can benefit scholarship in the humanities, while offering important concerns authors and editors must consider before deciding to implement the process.
Jenna Pack Sheffield
doaj   +1 more source

Competency and Curriculum of the Resident as Teacher: A Review and Suggestions [PDF]

open access: yes, 2021
Residents serve as educators who teach patients, medical students, fellow residents, and other medical personnel while being trained as learners. The purpose of this study was to review the literature on the competencies, perceptions, and educational ...
Korean Medical Education Review (의학교육논단)
core   +1 more source

A Critical Review of Medical Humanities Education Curriculum Development Based on Kern’s Curriculum Development Model [PDF]

open access: yes, 2020
Medical humanities education (MHE) is as essential as basic medical sciences and clinical medicine education. Despite the importance of MHE, MHE curriculum development (CD) has proven to be challenging.
Korean Medical Education Review (의학교육논단)
core   +1 more source

Opening up Peer Review [PDF]

open access: yesGenetics, 2020
PEER review can be decidedly challenging—for authors who must absorb and respond to criticism of their work, for reviewers who invest their time uncompensated (and mostly unrecognized), and for editors who must sometimes make hard decisions on their fellow scientists’ work.
Tracey A, DePellegrin, Mark, Johnston
openaire   +2 more sources

A review of the open charm and open bottom systems [PDF]

open access: yesReports on Progress in Physics, 2017
Abstract Since the discovery of the first charmed meson in 1976, many open-charm and open-bottom hadrons were observed. In 2003 two narrow charm-strange states
Chen H.X.   +4 more
openaire   +3 more sources

The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review [PDF]

open access: yesRoyal Society Open Science, 2016
Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles have many benefits, including easier replication and extension studies, increased availability of data for theory-building and meta-analysis, and increased possibility of review and collaboration ...
Richard D. Morey   +12 more
openaire   +13 more sources

Peer review and ‘openness’ [PDF]

open access: yesJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2009
The Editor states that publishing peer reviewers’ names is ‘a bold step in improving the transparency’ of the peer-review process, and is important in achieving a more open process.1 While one may respect Dr Abbassi's opinion in this regard, it appears to be an opinion held without objective supporting data.
openaire   +2 more sources

Open Strategy: State of the Art Review and Research Agenda [PDF]

open access: yes, 2017
Open strategy is an inclusive, transparent IT-enabled approach to organizational strategy used by several well-known organizations (e.g., Daimler, IBM, Wikimedia).
Schlagwein, D ; https://orcid.org/   +5 more
core   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy