Results 21 to 30 of about 10,762,244 (291)
A significant development of open science movement has been witnessed in the last five years. This could bring a fresh start to Indonesian academia. The objective of this paper is to showcase the advancement of open science concept and implementation ...
Dasapta Erwin Irawan +10 more
doaj +1 more source
Innovations in scholarly peer review at Nature Publishing Group and Palgrave Macmillan
The peer-review system is one of the cornerstones of quality, integrity and reproducibility in research, and its existence has enabled the scholarly publishing system to function for hundreds of years.
Amy Bourke-Waite
doaj +1 more source
Infinity in string cosmology: A review through open problems [PDF]
We review recent developments in the field of string cosmology with particular emphasis on open problems having to do mainly with geometric asymptotics and singularities.
Antoniadis, Ignatios, Cotsakis, Spiros
core +4 more sources
A review of the open charm and open bottom systems
Since the discovery of the first charmed meson in 1976, many open-charm and open-bottom hadrons were observed. In 2003 two narrow charm-strange states $D_{s0}^*(2317)$ and $D_{s1}(2460)$ were discovered by the BaBar and CLEO Collaborations, respectively.
Chen, Hua-Xing +4 more
core +2 more sources
A harm reduction approach to improving peer review by acknowledging its imperfections
This candid perspective written by scholars from diverse disciplinary backgrounds is intended to advance conversations about the realities of peer review and its inherent limitations. Trust in a process or institution is built slowly and can be destroyed
Steven J. Cooke +15 more
doaj +1 more source
Guidelines for open peer review implementation
Open peer review (OPR) is moving into the mainstream, but it is often poorly understood and surveys of researcher attitudes show important barriers to implementation.
Tony Ross-Hellauer, Edit Görögh
doaj +1 more source
EFORT Open Reviews: Turbulence
Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:568-569. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200200
openaire +2 more sources
How to Peer Review for Scientific Journals?
Peer review is the evaluation of scientific, academic, or professional work by experts in the field. This process starts when the editor of a peer-reviewed journal sends an article or a manuscript to two or more reviewers for review.
Mukta Wyawahare
doaj +1 more source
Crafting a Systematic Literature Review on Open-Source Platforms [PDF]
This working paper unveils the crafting of a systematic literature review on open-source platforms. The high-competitive mobile devices market, where several players such as Apple, Google, Nokia and Microsoft run a platforms- war with constant shifts in ...
C.H. Ferguson +10 more
core +2 more sources
A previous survey of African medical journals identified the need to assist journals and public health researchers to make publications more openly accessible. This article reports a subsequent survey to describe knowledge of, barriers to and interest in
Pasipanodya Ian Machingura Ruredzo +3 more
doaj +1 more source

