Results 31 to 40 of about 3,137,448 (307)
Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada
Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2018 BACKGROUND: Peer review is used to determine what research is funded and published, yet little is known about its effectiveness, and it is suspected that there may be biases.
R. Tamblyn +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
, 2023 Peer review is a quality control mechanism in scholarly research. Most usage refers to a process in which after a paper has been submitted to a journal - an editor of that journal invites independent (external) experts to evaluate that work and provide advice on how the paper could be improved before it is published and shared with the world.
openaire +1 more source
London Review of Education, 2020 School peer reviews are increasingly part of the evaluation and school improvement landscape for school leaders and teachers in a number of countries.
doaj +2 more sources
The emergence of a field: a network analysis of research on peer review
Scientometrics, 2017 This article provides a quantitative analysis of peer review as an emerging field of research by revealing patterns and connections between authors, fields and journals from 1950 to 2016.
V. Batagelj, A. Ferligoj, F. Squazzoni
semanticscholar +1 more source
Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation [PDF]
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2011 In this paper we review several novel approaches for research evaluation. We start with a brief overview of the peer review, its controversies, and metrics for assessing efficiency and overall quality of the peer review. We then discuss five approaches, including reputation-based ones, that come out of the research carried out by the LiquidPub project ...
Aliaksandr eBirukou +10 more
openaire +6 more sources
PLoS ONE, 2017 Objective To review the literature on strategies implemented or identified to prevent or reduce gender bias in peer review of research grants. Methods Studies of any type of qualitative or quantitative design examining interventions to reduce or prevent ...
A. Tricco +10 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2020 Peer review is a critical component toward facilitating a robust science in industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology. Peer review exists beyond academic publishing in organizations, university departments, grant agencies, classrooms, and many more ...
T. Köhler +7 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Researcher Perspectives on Publication and Peer Review of Data
PLOS ONE, 2015 Data "publication'' seeks to appropriate the prestige of authorship in the peer-reviewed literature to reward researchers who create useful and well-documented datasets. The scholarly communication community has embraced data publication as an incentive to document and share data. But, numerous new and ongoing experiments in implementation have not yet
Kratz, John Ernest E, Strasser, Carly
openaire +7 more sources
Peer-Reviewed Open Research Data: Results of a Pilot [PDF]
International Journal of Digital Curation, 2012 Peer review of publications is at the core of science and primarily seen as instrument for ensuring research quality. However, it is less common to independently value the quality of the underlying data as well. In the light of the ‘data deluge’ it makes sense to extend peer review to the data itself and this way evaluate the degree to which the data ...
Grootveld, Marjan, van Egmond, Jeff
openaire +9 more sources
Quantifying professionalism in peer review
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2020 The process of peer-review in academia has attracted criticism surrounding issues of bias, fairness, and professionalism; however, frequency of occurrence of such comments is unknown.
T. Gerwing +5 more
semanticscholar +1 more source