Results 31 to 40 of about 2,725,232 (305)

Peer-Reviewed Open Research Data: Results of a Pilot [PDF]

International Journal of Digital Curation, 2012
Peer review of publications is at the core of science and primarily seen as instrument for ensuring research quality. However, it is less common to independently value the quality of the underlying data as well. In the light of the ‘data deluge’ it makes sense to extend peer review to the data itself and this way evaluate the degree to which the data ...
Grootveld, Marjan, van Egmond, Jeff
openaire   +9 more sources

Researcher Perspectives on Publication and Peer Review of Data

PLOS ONE, 2015
Data "publication'' seeks to appropriate the prestige of authorship in the peer-reviewed literature to reward researchers who create useful and well-documented datasets. The scholarly communication community has embraced data publication as an incentive to document and share data. But, numerous new and ongoing experiments in implementation have not yet
Kratz, John Ernest E, Strasser, Carly
openaire   +7 more sources

Taking part counts : Adolescents' experiences of the transition from inactivity to active participation in school based physical education [PDF]

, 2006
This is a pre-copy-editing, author produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Health Education Research following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Brooks, F. and Magnusson, J. (2006) 'Taking part counts: Adolescents'
Brooks, F., Magnusson, J.
core   +1 more source

What makes an eLife paper in epidemiology and global health?

eLife, 2015
The best papers provide evidence that can be used to make changes that improve the health and lives of people around the world.
Mark Jit, Eduardo Franco, Prabhat Jha
doaj   +1 more source

occumb: An R package for site occupancy modeling of eDNA metabarcoding data

Population Ecology, EarlyView.
This study introduces a new R package, occumb, for the convenient application of site occupancy modeling using environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding data. We outline a data analysis workflow, including data setup, model fitting, model assessment, and comparison of potential study settings based on model predictions, all of which can be performed using
Keiichi Fukaya, Yuta Hasebe
wiley   +1 more source

A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review [version 2; referees: 2 approved] [PDF]

, 2017
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of its importance, the status and purpose of peer review is often contested. What is its role in our modern digital research and communications infrastructure?
A Albert, A Antonopoulos, A Bedeian, A Begel, A Boldt, A Budden, A Chauvin, A Csiszar, A Dappert, A Fyfe, A Halavais, A Harmon, A Hettyey, A Jadad, A Justice, A Kosner, A Link, A Manten, A Margalida, A Mhurchú, A Mulligan, A Mulligan, A Pallavi Sudhir, A Plume, A Smith, A Tomkins, B Brembs, B Brembs, B Carlisle, B Cohen, B Cope, B Edgar, B Heaberlin, B Kuehn, B List, B Nosek, B Rodríguez-Bravo, B Schmidt, C Ball, C Berthaud, C Chambers, C Chambers, C Fox, C Goues, C Haug, C Kelty, C Lee, C Lee, C Neylon, C Sutton, C Szegedy, C Vitolo, D Adam, D Crotty, D Eckberg, D Horrobin, D Kronick, D Lee, D Luzi, D Mietchen, D Moher, D Peters, D Pontille, D Pontille, D Rennie, D Rennie, D Shotton, D Singh Chawla, D Stanton, D Whaley, E Black, E Darling, E Ernst, E Ford, E Gibney, E Katsh, E McKiernan, E Walsh, F Godlee, F Godlee, F Salager-Meyer, F Salager-Meyer, F Squazzoni, F Squazzoni, F Thung, G Klyne, G McKiernan, G Pullum, H Daniel, H Moed, H Oldenburg, H Zuckerman, I Al-Rahawi, J Armstrong, J Baggs, J Burnham, J Campanario, J Campanario, J Chevalier, J Galipeau, J Haider, J Hukkinen, J Ioannidis, J Kubátová, J Leek, J Lerback, J Magee, J Morrison, J Nicholson, J Overbeke, J Patel, J Perkel, J Pierie, J Priem, J Priem, J Priem, J Riggs, J Ross, J Smith, J Tennant, J Tennant, J Ubois, J Wicherts, J Yli-Huumo, K Burghardt, K Fitzpatrick, K Fitzpatrick, K Fitzpatrick, K Graf, K Janowicz, K Lui, K Mayden, K Okike, K Siler, K Siler, K Siler, K Torpey, L Bornmann, L Bornmann, L Bornmann, L Bornmann, L Grivell, L Heller, L Li, L Paglione, L Parnell, L Penev, L Prechelt, L Sanger, L Snell, L Stemmle, L Teytelman, L Xiao, L Xiao, M Almquist, M Alvesson, M Baldwin, M Baldwin, M Baldwin, M Biagioli, M Blatt, M Bon, M Breuning, M Eisen, M Fox, M Gashler, M Gibson, M Helmer, M Hu, M Jubb, M Khan, M Kovanis, M Lloyd, M Mahoney, M Marra, M Munafò, M Rodriguez, M Rodriguez, M Seeber, M Swan, M van Assen, M von Muhlen, M Ware, M Ware, M Weicher, N Belojevic, N Casnici, N Fukuzawa, N Kriegeskorte, N McCormack, N Moxham, N Ross, N Thompson, N Zamiska, P Dall’Aglio, P Davis, P Davis, P Frishauf, P Ginsparg, P Gøtzsche, P Larsen, P Maharg, P Perakakis, P Rodgers, P Sobkowicz, Q Schiermeier, R Bernstein, R Blank, R Bruce, R D’Andrea, R Emilsson, R Gropp, R Hasty, R Kostoff, R Lyman, R McNutt, R Melero, R Merton, R Merton, R Procter, R Procter, R Raaper, R Rughiniş, R Smith, R Smith, R Snodgrass, R Spier, R Steen, R Van Noorden, R Walker, R Whittaker, S Anderson, S Bartling, S Cole, S Ghosh, S Goodman, S Greaves, S Greenberg, S Gupta, S Isenberg, S Moore, S Mudambi, S Nakamoto, S Nobarany, S Owens, S Palus, S Pinfield, S Pocock, S Roberts, S Schroter, S Schroter, S Shuttleworth, S van Rooyen, S van Rooyen, S van Rooyen, S Wakeling, S Wodak, S Yeo, T Farley, T Jefferson, T Jefferson, T Kuhn, T Kuhn, T Murphy, T Putman, T Ross-Hellauer, T Tregenza, T Vines, T Vines, T Webb, T Yarkoni, U Pöschl, V Burris, V Dhillon, V Larivière, V Larivière, V Warne, W Baxt, W Benda, W Lipworth, W Lipworth, W Wang, W Wang, Y Elkhatib, Y Tausczik   +284 more
core   +5 more sources

Muller’s nobel prize research and peer review [PDF]

Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 2018
This paper assesses possible reasons why Hermann J. Muller avoided peer-review of data that became the basis of his Nobel Prize award for producing gene mutations in male Drosophila by X-rays.Extensive correspondence between Muller and close associates and other materials were obtained from preserved papers to compliment extensive publications by and ...
openaire   +4 more sources

Between Droughts and Floods: The Seasonal Response of Freshwater Snails in Artificial Reservoirs in the Brazilian Semiarid Region

Population Ecology, EarlyView.
We investigate the seasonal dynamics of two freshwater snails, Biomphalaria straminea and Melanoides tuberculata, in artificial reservoirs of the Brazilian semiarid region. Despite regulated hydrology, B. straminea exhibited strong seasonal fluctuations associated with dry periods, while M. tuberculata maintained stable populations throughout the year,
Lucas Henrique Sousa da Silva, João Hemerson de Sousa, Adriana Josefa da Rocha, Manuella Feitosa Leal, Lucas Ariel de Sousa Aguiar, Tamaris Gimenez Pinheiro, Edson Lourenço da Silva   +6 more
wiley   +1 more source

Responding to, and learning from, peer review feedback. [PDF]

, 2016
What is peer review in research? Peer review is the process of assessing the scientific quality of a research proposal, research report and/or paper by an independent expert, usually an academic or clinical ...
Milnes, L, Smith, J
core   +1 more source

Peer review without gatekeeping

eLife, 2022
eLife is changing its editorial process to emphasize public reviews and assessments of preprints by eliminating accept/reject decisions after peer review.
Michael B Eisen, Anna Akhmanova, Timothy E Behrens, Jörn Diedrichsen, Diane M Harper, Mihaela D Iordanova, Detlef Weigel, Mone Zaidi   +7 more
doaj   +1 more source