Results 51 to 60 of about 2,889,538 (305)

Transferrin receptor 1‐mediated iron uptake supports thermogenic activation in human cervical‐derived adipocytes

FEBS Letters, EarlyView.
In this study, we found that human cervical‐derived adipocytes maintain intracellular iron level by regulating the expression of iron transport‐related proteins during adrenergic stimulation. Melanotransferrin is predicted to interact with transferrin receptor 1 based on in silico analysis.
Rahaf Alrifai, Mizuki Seo, Gyath Karadsheh, Fachrur Rizal Mahendra, Máté Á Demény, Ferenc Győry, János András Mótyán, László Fésüs, Endre Kristóf, Rini Arianti   +9 more
wiley   +1 more source

How to Peer Review for Scientific Journals?

International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research
Peer review is the evaluation of scientific, academic, or professional work by experts in the field. This process starts when the editor of a peer-reviewed journal sends an article or a manuscript to two or more reviewers for review.
Mukta Wyawahare
doaj   +1 more source

Constitution Identification System for Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Based on Correlation Between TCM Constitution and Physical Examination Indices

Digital Chinese Medicine, 2018
: Objective Identification of one’s constitution based on a combination of features and back propagation neural network theory is needed in modern medicine and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM).
Yue Luo, Bing Lin, Chuan-Biao Wen, Jie-Lin He   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Peer review without gatekeeping

eLife, 2022
eLife is changing its editorial process to emphasize public reviews and assessments of preprints by eliminating accept/reject decisions after peer review.
Michael B Eisen, Anna Akhmanova, Timothy E Behrens, Jörn Diedrichsen, Diane M Harper, Mihaela D Iordanova, Detlef Weigel, Mone Zaidi   +7 more
doaj   +1 more source

Meta-research on Peer Review

, 2023
Peer review is a quality control mechanism in scholarly research. Most usage refers to a process in which after a paper has been submitted to a journal - an editor of that journal invites independent (external) experts to evaluate that work and provide advice on how the paper could be improved before it is published and shared with the world.
openaire   +1 more source

Has the time come for preprints in biology? [PDF]

, 2016
Preprints, non-peer-reviewed drafts of manuscripts available on the Internet, have been used in conjunction with peer review and publication in journals in the physical sciences for almost 25 years.
Bhalla, Needhi
core   +1 more source

Tau acetylation at K331 has limited impact on tau pathology in vivo

FEBS Letters, EarlyView.
We mapped tau post‐translational modifications in humanized MAPT knock‐in mice and in amyloid‐bearing double knock‐in mice. Acetylation within the repeat domain, particularly around K331, showed modest increases under amyloid pathology. To test functional relevance, we generated MAPTK331Q knock‐in mice.
Shoko Hashimoto, Yukio Matsuba, Mika Takahashi, Takaomi C. Saido   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

Using democracy to award research funding: an observational study

Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2017
Background Winning funding for health and medical research usually involves a lengthy application process. With success rates under 20%, much of the time spent by 80% of applicants could have been better used on actual research.
Adrian G. Barnett, Philip Clarke, Cedryck Vaquette, Nicholas Graves   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Modern Trends in Research Assessment: A Case of the Netherlands

Ekonomika Nauki, 2023
After the departure of commercial scientific information databases such as Scopus and Web of Science from Russia, the problem of building a new system for research assessment is more relevant than ever.
D. M. Kochetkov
doaj   +1 more source

A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review [version 2; referees: 2 approved] [PDF]

, 2017
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of its importance, the status and purpose of peer review is often contested. What is its role in our modern digital research and communications infrastructure?
A Albert, A Antonopoulos, A Bedeian, A Begel, A Boldt, A Budden, A Chauvin, A Csiszar, A Dappert, A Fyfe, A Halavais, A Harmon, A Hettyey, A Jadad, A Justice, A Kosner, A Link, A Manten, A Margalida, A Mhurchú, A Mulligan, A Mulligan, A Pallavi Sudhir, A Plume, A Smith, A Tomkins, B Brembs, B Brembs, B Carlisle, B Cohen, B Cope, B Edgar, B Heaberlin, B Kuehn, B List, B Nosek, B Rodríguez-Bravo, B Schmidt, C Ball, C Berthaud, C Chambers, C Chambers, C Fox, C Goues, C Haug, C Kelty, C Lee, C Lee, C Neylon, C Sutton, C Szegedy, C Vitolo, D Adam, D Crotty, D Eckberg, D Horrobin, D Kronick, D Lee, D Luzi, D Mietchen, D Moher, D Peters, D Pontille, D Pontille, D Rennie, D Rennie, D Shotton, D Singh Chawla, D Stanton, D Whaley, E Black, E Darling, E Ernst, E Ford, E Gibney, E Katsh, E McKiernan, E Walsh, F Godlee, F Godlee, F Salager-Meyer, F Salager-Meyer, F Squazzoni, F Squazzoni, F Thung, G Klyne, G McKiernan, G Pullum, H Daniel, H Moed, H Oldenburg, H Zuckerman, I Al-Rahawi, J Armstrong, J Baggs, J Burnham, J Campanario, J Campanario, J Chevalier, J Galipeau, J Haider, J Hukkinen, J Ioannidis, J Kubátová, J Leek, J Lerback, J Magee, J Morrison, J Nicholson, J Overbeke, J Patel, J Perkel, J Pierie, J Priem, J Priem, J Priem, J Riggs, J Ross, J Smith, J Tennant, J Tennant, J Ubois, J Wicherts, J Yli-Huumo, K Burghardt, K Fitzpatrick, K Fitzpatrick, K Fitzpatrick, K Graf, K Janowicz, K Lui, K Mayden, K Okike, K Siler, K Siler, K Siler, K Torpey, L Bornmann, L Bornmann, L Bornmann, L Bornmann, L Grivell, L Heller, L Li, L Paglione, L Parnell, L Penev, L Prechelt, L Sanger, L Snell, L Stemmle, L Teytelman, L Xiao, L Xiao, M Almquist, M Alvesson, M Baldwin, M Baldwin, M Baldwin, M Biagioli, M Blatt, M Bon, M Breuning, M Eisen, M Fox, M Gashler, M Gibson, M Helmer, M Hu, M Jubb, M Khan, M Kovanis, M Lloyd, M Mahoney, M Marra, M Munafò, M Rodriguez, M Rodriguez, M Seeber, M Swan, M van Assen, M von Muhlen, M Ware, M Ware, M Weicher, N Belojevic, N Casnici, N Fukuzawa, N Kriegeskorte, N McCormack, N Moxham, N Ross, N Thompson, N Zamiska, P Dall’Aglio, P Davis, P Davis, P Frishauf, P Ginsparg, P Gøtzsche, P Larsen, P Maharg, P Perakakis, P Rodgers, P Sobkowicz, Q Schiermeier, R Bernstein, R Blank, R Bruce, R D’Andrea, R Emilsson, R Gropp, R Hasty, R Kostoff, R Lyman, R McNutt, R Melero, R Merton, R Merton, R Procter, R Procter, R Raaper, R Rughiniş, R Smith, R Smith, R Snodgrass, R Spier, R Steen, R Van Noorden, R Walker, R Whittaker, S Anderson, S Bartling, S Cole, S Ghosh, S Goodman, S Greaves, S Greenberg, S Gupta, S Isenberg, S Moore, S Mudambi, S Nakamoto, S Nobarany, S Owens, S Palus, S Pinfield, S Pocock, S Roberts, S Schroter, S Schroter, S Shuttleworth, S van Rooyen, S van Rooyen, S van Rooyen, S Wakeling, S Wodak, S Yeo, T Farley, T Jefferson, T Jefferson, T Kuhn, T Kuhn, T Murphy, T Putman, T Ross-Hellauer, T Tregenza, T Vines, T Vines, T Webb, T Yarkoni, U Pöschl, V Burris, V Dhillon, V Larivière, V Larivière, V Warne, W Baxt, W Benda, W Lipworth, W Lipworth, W Wang, W Wang, Y Elkhatib, Y Tausczik   +284 more
core   +5 more sources