Results 71 to 80 of about 894,999 (265)
Clashing Concepts and Methods: Assessing Excellence in the Humanities and Social Sciences
The humanities are going through a period of exceptional vitality characterised by the proliferation of novel interpretative frameworks, methodologies and perspectives.
Peter Scott
doaj +1 more source
Peer Review Research Evaluation in Iran: Strengths, Weaknesses and Suggestions. [PDF]
Eftekhari MB +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
Aptamers are used both therapeutically and as targeting agents in cancer treatment. We developed an aptamer‐targeted PLGA–TRAIL nanosystem that exhibited superior therapeutic efficacy in NOD/SCID breast cancer models. This nanosystem represents a novel biotechnological drug candidate for suppressing resistance development in breast cancer.
Gulen Melike Demirbolat +8 more
wiley +1 more source
Research on peer review and biomedical publication [PDF]
Sara, Schroter +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Peer review: what are the OBJN responsabilities?
As other scientific journals, the Online braz j of nurs is a vehicle to exchange knowledge and scientific information within the scientific and professional community.
Isabel CF da Cruz
doaj
In this explorative study, the abundance of circular RNA molecules in bone marrow stem cells was found to be elevated in patients with high‐risk myelodysplastic neoplasms, and to be associated with an increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia.
Eileen Wedge +17 more
wiley +1 more source
Subtype‐specific enhancer RNAs define transcriptional regulators and prognosis in breast cancers
This study employed machine learning methodologies to perform the subtype‐specific classification of RNA‐seq data sets, which are mapped on enhancers from TCGA‐derived breast cancer patients. Their integration with gene expression (referred to as ProxCReAM eRNAs) and chromatin accessibility profiles has the potential to identify lineage‐specific and ...
Aamena Y. Patel +6 more
wiley +1 more source
Peer reviewers’ conflicts of interest in biomedical research: scoping review [PDF]
BackgroundPeer review may improve the quality of research manuscripts and aid in editorial decisions, but reviewers can have conflicts of interest that impact on their recommendations.ObjectivesThe objective was to systematically map and describe the extent and nature of empirical research on peer reviewers’ conflicts of interest in biomedical research.
Christoffer Bruun Korfitsen +5 more
openaire +4 more sources
Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) reduces growth of HPV‐positive cervical cancer spheroids and induces ferroptosis in cervical cancer cells via blocking SLC7A11/Glutathione (GSH) axis. Combination of subcytotoxic doses of DMF and cisplatin (CDDP) further suppresses spheroid growth and drives cell death in 2D culture models.
Carolina Punziano +6 more
wiley +1 more source
Role of Peer Review in Surgical Research
Vincent Kipkorir +2 more
doaj +1 more source

