Results 141 to 150 of about 12,957,925 (392)

Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective

Scientometrics, 2017
To gain insight into the duration and quality of the scientific peer review process, we analyzed data from 3500 review experiences submitted by authors to the SciRev.sc website.
Janine Huisman, J. Smits
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Cell wall target fragment discovery using a low‐cost, minimal fragment library

FEBS Letters, EarlyView.
LoCoFrag100 is a fragment library made up of 100 different compounds. Similarity between the fragments is minimized and 10 different fragments are mixed into a single cocktail, which is soaked to protein crystals. These crystals are analysed by X‐ray crystallography, revealing the binding modes of the bound fragment ligands.
Kaizhou Yan, Mathew Stanley, Olawale Raimi, Andrew T. Ferenbach, Helge C Dorfmueller, Daan M. F. van Aalten   +5 more
wiley   +1 more source

Peer Comment

Internet Archaeology, 2015
Peer comment on Blogging the Field School: Teaching Digital Public Archaeology by Terry P. Brock and Lynne Goldstein.
Whitney Battle-Baptiste
doaj   +1 more source

Inhibiting stearoyl‐CoA desaturase suppresses bone metastatic prostate cancer by modulating cellular stress, mTOR signaling, and DNA damage response

FEBS Letters, EarlyView.
Bone metastasis in prostate cancer (PCa) patients is a clinical hurdle due to the poor understanding of the supportive bone microenvironment. Here, we identify stearoyl‐CoA desaturase (SCD) as a tumor‐promoting enzyme and potential therapeutic target in bone metastatic PCa.
Alexis Wilson, Mackenzie K Herroon, Shane Mecca, Laimar C Garmo, Jacob Lindquist, Shrila Rajendran, Steve M. Patrick, Izabela Podgorski   +7 more
wiley   +1 more source

Who Is (Likely) Peer-Reviewing Your Papers? A Partial Insight into the World’s Top Reviewers

Publications, 2019
Scientific publishing is experiencing unprecedented growth in terms of outputs across all fields. Inevitably this creates pressure throughout the system on a number of entities.
Francesco Pomponi, Bernardino D’Amico, Tom Rye   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Peer reviewers [PDF]

JACEP Open, 2021
openaire   +3 more sources

Gender and international diversity improves equity in peer review

bioRxiv, 2018
The robustness of scholarly peer review has been challenged by evidence of disparities in publication outcomes based on author’s gender and nationality.
Dakota S. Murray, Kyle Siler, V. Larivière, Wei Mun Chan, Andrew M. Collings, Jennifer Raymond, Cassidy R. Sugimoto   +6 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

The (Glg)ABCs of cyanobacteria: modelling of glycogen synthesis and functional divergence of glycogen synthases in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803

FEBS Letters, EarlyView.
We reconstituted Synechocystis glycogen synthesis in vitro from purified enzymes and showed that two GlgA isoenzymes produce glycogen with different architectures: GlgA1 yields denser, highly branched glycogen, whereas GlgA2 synthesizes longer, less‐branched chains.
Kenric Lee, Dimitrios Bekiari, Sofia Doello, Karl Forchhammer   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

Efficacy of a meal sequence in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care, 2022
Yuki Kataoka, Jun Watanabe, Yukiko Okami, Hideki Tsunoda   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Moving peer review transparency from process to praxis

Insights: The UKSG Journal, 2019
Scholarly publications often work to provide transparency of peer-review processes, posting policy information to their websites as suggested by the Committee on Publication Ethics’ (COPE) 'Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Publishing'. Yet
Emily Ford
doaj   +1 more source