Results 1 to 10 of about 145 (118)
How argumentation theory can inform assessment validity: A critical review. [PDF]
Med Educ, 2022 Abstract Introduction Many health professions education (HPE) scholars frame assessment validity as a form of argumentation in which interpretations and uses of assessment scores must be supported by evidence. However, what are purported to be validity arguments are often merely clusters of evidence without a guiding framework to evaluate, prioritise ...
Kinnear B +3 more
europepmc +2 more sources
Towards an experimental account of argumentation: the case of the slippery slope and the ad hominem arguments [PDF]
Frontiers in Psychology, 2014 Argumentation is a crucial component of our lives. Although in the absence of rational debate our legal, political, and scientific systems would not be possible, there is still no integrated area of research on the psychology of argumentation ...
Marco eLillo-Unglaube +3 more
doaj +2 more sources
The Logical Perspective in Pragma-dialectics
TopoiAbstractI argue that the logical perspective—the study of arguments as products—is not well integrated into pragma-dialectics. I show that the Validity Rule and the Argumentation Scheme Rule, despite being procedural rules, are, in a certain sense, “logical” rules.
Hubert Marraud, Marraud Hubert
exaly +3 more sources
A pragma-dialectical response to objectivist epistemic challenges
Informal Logic, 2010 The epistemologists Biro and Siegel have raised two objections against the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation. According to the first objection the pragma-dialectical theory is not genuinely normative.
Bart Garssen, Jan Albert van Laar
doaj +5 more sources
The Making of Pragma-Dialectics: A Synopsis
TopoiAbstractIn ‘The Making of Pragma-Dialectics: A Synopsis’ the authors give an overview of the pragma-dialectical argumentation theory. First they characterize the five components of the research program: critical rationalistic philosophy, pragma-dialectical theory, qualitative and quantitative empirical research, resolution-oriented reconstructive ...
Frans H Van Eemeren +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
Pragma-dialectics and the problem of agreement
TopoiAbstractPragma-Dialectics (PD) is an approach to argumentation that can be described as disagreement-centric. On PD, disagreement is the condition which defines argument, it is the practical problem to be solved by it, and disagreement’s management is the ultimate source of argument’s normativity.
Scott F Aikin +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [PDF]
Argumentation, 1987 In the pragma-dialectical approach, fallacies are considered incorrect moves in a discussion for which the goal is successful resolution of a dispute. Ten rules are given for effective conduct at the various stages of such a critical discussion (confrontation, opening, argumentation, concluding).
van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R.
openaire +4 more sources
Characterizing Reflective Diary Writing as an Argumentative Activity Type
Informal Logic, 2022 This paper is focused on the practice of unsolicited, reflective diary writing as an act of externalizing internal dialogue. I suggest that it should be analyzed as an argumentative practice from the point of view of pragma-dialectics. In the first part
Iva Svačinová
doaj +1 more source
Journal of Environmental and Public Health, Volume 2022, Issue 1, 2022., 2022 Western environmental philosophy was born out of the environmental movement that emerged in the second half of the 20th century, and it is fundamentally practical in orientation. However, over the past 50 years, the study of environmental philosophy has become increasingly abstract and theoretical and seems to have drifted away from the practice of ...
Yangyang Ge, Chongqing Wang
wiley +1 more source