Results 21 to 30 of about 145 (118)

La normativité naturelle : une théorie de l’argumentation comme discipline engagée

Argumentation et Analyse du Discours, 2009
Natural normativity describes the means whereby social and cultural controls are placed on argumentative behaviour. The three main components of this are Goals, Context, and Ethos, which combine to form a dynamic and situational framework.
Michael A. Gilbert
doaj   +1 more source

A Reaction to Critique from the Epistemological Sidelines

Informal Logic
In this paper, a reaction is presented to Siegel’s claim that the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation ignores or neglects epistemological viewpoints that he finds vital to any normative theory of argumentation.
Bart Garssen
doaj   +1 more source

Natural Normativity: Argumentation Theory as an Engaged Discipline

Informal Logic, 2008
Natural normativity describes the means whereby social and cultural controls are placed on argumentative behaviour. The three main components of this are Goals, Context, and Ethos, which combine to form a dynamic and situational framework.
Michael A. Gilbert
doaj   +1 more source

Being Reasonable

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 2015
Where do the rules of critical discussion get their normative force? What kinds of norms are involved? Unreasonable behaviour in the critical discussion - e.g., continuing to assert the contradictory of a proven standpoint, performing some action ...
Botting David
doaj   +1 more source

Strategic Manoeuvering in 2019 Campaign Speeches in the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa: Extended Pragma-Dialectical Perspective

Modern Africa, 2023
This article investigates how political candidates in the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa employed means of strategic manoeuvring during the provincial election campaigns of 2019.
Zameka Paula Sijadu, Gaspardus Mwombeki
doaj   +1 more source

Giving Reasons, A Contribution to Argumentation Theory

Theoria, 2011
In Giving Reasons: A Linguistic-pragmatic-approach to Argumentation Theory (Springer, 2011), I provide a new model for the semantic and pragmatic appraisal of argumentation.
Lilian Bermejo-Luque
doaj   +1 more source

A World of Difference: The Rich State of Argumentation Theory

Informal Logic, 1995
This paper surveys the contributions to the study of argumentation in the two decades since the work of Toulmin and Perelman. Developments include Radical Argumentativism (Anscombre and Ducot), Communication and Rhetoric (American Speech Communication ...
Frans H. van Eemeren
doaj   +1 more source

Review of How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell-Copleston Debate

Informal Logic, 2023
This article reviews Fernando Leal and Hubert Marraud’s How Philosopher’s Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell-Copleston Debate  (Springer 2022).
Leo A. Groarke
doaj   +1 more source

Social Rationality and Human Reasoning: Logical Expressivism and the Flat Mind

Topics in Cognitive Science, Volume 17, Issue 3, Page 636-661, July 2025.
Abstract This paper attempts to reconcile the claims that the mind is both flat (Chater, 2018) and highly rational (Oaksford & Chater, 2020). According to the flat mind hypothesis, the mind is a mass of inconsistent and contradictory fragments of experience.
Mike Oaksford
wiley   +1 more source

Patients and psychotherapists using concessive counter‐argumentation: Co‐constructing new framings

Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, Volume 24, Issue 1, Page 169-179, March 2024.
Abstract Shifting point of view and imagining alternative scenarios can be considered crucial goals of every therapeutic path. Reframing is aimed at stimulating other hypotheses and new viewpoints of the same situation and at adding complexity to one's own and to the others' world images.
Margherita Luciani, Josephine Convertini
wiley   +1 more source