Results 101 to 110 of about 29,147 (139)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
OBJECTIVE: To influence health behavior, communication has to be relevant on an individual level and, thus, fulfill the requirement of premissary relevance.
Nanon Labrie, Daniel J O'Keefe
exaly +2 more sources
Rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective
Argumentation, 1988Starting from a concept of reasonableness as well-consideredness, it is discussed in what way science could serve as a model for reasonable argumentation. It turns out that in order to be reasonable two requirements have to be fulfilled. The argumentation should comply with rules which are both problem-valid and intersubjectively valid. Geometrical and
van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R.
openaire +2 more sources
Deliberative Democracy and Pragma-Dialectics Related [PDF]
This paper adopts a pragma-dialectic approach to explore inclusion in real-world argumentation. Having outlined theories of deliberative democracy—focussing on Habermas’s discourse model—and pragma-dialectic methods for analysing argumentative exchanges ...
Stephen J Williams
exaly +2 more sources
A Pragma-dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion
Argumentation, 2003In a critical discussion that proceeds in accordance with a pragma-dialectical discussion procedure, the protagonist and the antagonist try to find out systematically whether the protagonist’s standpoint is capable of withstanding the antagonist’s criticism.
van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R.
openaire +2 more sources
2006
The pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation aims to provide a sound integration of both dialectics — the study of critical exchanges — and pragmatics — the study of language use in actual communication. Pragma dialectics thus combines a dialectical view of argumentative reasonableness with a pragmatic view of the verbal moves made in argumentative
van Eemeren, F.H., Houtlosser, P.
openaire +2 more sources
The pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation aims to provide a sound integration of both dialectics — the study of critical exchanges — and pragmatics — the study of language use in actual communication. Pragma dialectics thus combines a dialectical view of argumentative reasonableness with a pragmatic view of the verbal moves made in argumentative
van Eemeren, F.H., Houtlosser, P.
openaire +2 more sources
The Development of the Pragma-dialectical Approach to Argumentation
Argumentation, 2003This paper describes the development of pragma-dialectics as a theory of argumentative discourse. First the development of the pragma-dialectical model of a critical discussion is explained, with the rules that are to be complied with in order to avoid fallacies from occurring.
van Eemeren, F.H., Houtlosser, P.
openaire +2 more sources
On questions in standard pragma-dialectics
Quadripartita Ratio, 2021El propósito del artículo es añadir el concepto de cuestión a la pragma-dialéctica estándar de forma tal que el concepto, hasta ahora básico, de punto de vista pueda ser definido mediante aquél. Con ello el concepto de cuestión se vuelve el concepto básico de la pragma-dialéctica estándar. Siendo básico, el concepto de cuestión no puede definirse.
openaire +1 more source
Pragma-Dialectics and Pragma-Dialectics
2011The hypothesis of this chapter is that the Pragma-Dialectical theory is one particular version—the Amsterdam version—of a general pragma-dialectical type of theory. It is thus possible to accept the general theory without accepting every feature of the specific instance of that theory, but not conversely.
openaire +1 more source
Argumentation, 2003
Pragma-dialectics is dynamic, context-sensitive, and multi-agent; it promises theories of fallacy and argumentative structure. But pragma-dialectic theory and practice are not yet fully in harmony. Key definitions of the theory fall short of explicating the analyses that pragma-dialecticians actually do.
openaire +1 more source
Pragma-dialectics is dynamic, context-sensitive, and multi-agent; it promises theories of fallacy and argumentative structure. But pragma-dialectic theory and practice are not yet fully in harmony. Key definitions of the theory fall short of explicating the analyses that pragma-dialecticians actually do.
openaire +1 more source

